Talk:Divina proportione

Isn't the book itself a source? duh. I'll add it myself.--20-dude (talk) 23:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but see primary sources. The book a primary source. Secondary sources are preferred, and are required, for example, to answer the citation request currently in the article and to verify that two versions exist today. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 00:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Conflicting information

• The intro says: Two versions of the original manuscript.

• The body of the text says: Two prints of the original book.

These mean entirely different things. Please find out which one is true. Are there "two versions"? Are there two "manuscripts" (ie handwritten)?

Or are there really only two remaining copies of the original print run?

Check your sources. Some are rather carelessly written.

Amandajm (talk) 10:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

What's in a name....

• When Leonardo was in Vinci, he was "Leonardo di Ser Piero" (son of Mister Piero). This was an important name for Leonardo in his home town, because it meant that even though he was illegitimate, his father had claimed paternity.
• When Leonardo moved to Florence as a lad, he became "Leonardo from Vinci" to distinguish himself from other Leonardos in Florence.
• When he went to live in Milan, he was called "Leonardo from Florence", to distinguish him from other Leonardos.

The "da Vinci" was not an essential part of Leonardo's name. So his name is properly abbreviated to "Leonardo", not to "da Vinci".

This is normal among Renaissance artists. Giotto, Michelangelo and Raphael are all known to posterity by there Christian names, and it is considered a bit pretentious to insist on referring to Michelangelo Buonarotti. Quite a number of artists are known by nicknames. These include Masaccio (Tom the Slob), Botticelli (Tubby Bubby), Tintoretto (Colour Man) and Sodoma (don't ask!)

Amandajm (talk) 11:16, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on De divina proportione. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150127090823/http://ww3.ac-poitiers.fr:80/arts_p/b@lise14/pageshtm/page_4.htm to http://ww3.ac-poitiers.fr/arts_p/b@lise14/pageshtm/page_4.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)