Talk:Diwan Manna

Copyvio cleanup required

Hi @Diannaa: this article has major copyright violations [1]. Kindly clean this up, thanks in advance. KCVelaga (talk) 19:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Earwig's tool shows nothing. Even checking before the recent removals I am not seeing it. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: I can see 91.6% from the subject's personal website. Do you think that art work info is OK to kept, similar to quotes? KCVelaga (talk) 17:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Please post the url that overlaps with our article, so I can easily see what you are seeing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:08, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: These are the top three links, http://www.diwanmanna.com/page/biodata, http://www.lalitkalachandigarh.com/page/diwan-manna, and http://www.saffronart.com/artists/diwan-manna, having 91.6%, 63.4%, and 54.0%, violation respectively. KCVelaga (talk) 17:44, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for providing the links. These are all lists of exhibitions and don't need to be removed. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Changing the word advocate and mentioning the art academies

Hi @ST47: @Diannaa: @KCVelaga: In the section "Artworks", it has been mentioned that "Manna is one of the first artists from India to advocate conceptual photography". I understand advocate is a synonym of the word exponent. According to the dictionary: "Advocate" also means a person who publicly supports or recommends a particular cause or policy. And "Practicing" means the actual application or use of an idea, belief, or method, as opposed to theories relating to it. As far as I understand, Manna's practice is in conceptual photography. He does not advocate it rather uses it to put forward his thoughts and ideas, therefore, an alternative way of writing this sentence could be - "He is the first one to explore the possibilities of conceptual photography in the country" or "He is a pioneer amongst conceptual photographers in India" without attracting the copyright violations.

@Diannaa: @KCVelaga: Comparing different versions of this article- in version 20:06, 6 October 2019‎ edited by me it was mentioned "Lalit Kala Akademi, National Academy of Art, Ministry of Culture, Government of India", and so on; but in the version and 17:46, 8 October 2019‎ , it was changed to "Chandigarh Lalit Kala Akademi, an art academy run by Chandigarh Administration; Punjab Lalit Kala Akademi, an art academy run by the Government of Punjab. Academies of art (India) mentioned in this article are autonomous bodies established by the Governments of the respective states. Kindly refer to the below-mentioned websites: https://lalitkala.gov.in/index.php http://www.lalitkalachandigarh.com/ http://lalitkalaakademipunjab.com/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lalit_Kala_Akademi https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashok_Vajpeyi

In the articles in these links, it is clear that these bodies are established by the respective governments of either state, Union territory or the country.

My reference point was an article on Wikipedia on internationally acclaimed personality and former chairman of Lalit Kala Akademi (National Academy of Art), New Delhi (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashok_Vajpeyi). However, my humble submission is that, of course, I am a newcomer to Wikipedia, and if I am not able to follow the policy matters as per Wikipedia guidelines, I would like to learn and be corrected. Thank You. manjudkrishnaManjudkrishna (talk) 18:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)