Talk:Djenné

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Having lived in Djenné years ago and read on it since, I've noted that there is a wealth of misinformation on it and the region. This is not entirely surprising given the unusual (for Westerners) nature of the environment (seasonal floodplain, in effect; "tributaries" are actually defluents) and the society of the area (highly diverse ethnically and linguistically). I certainly don't claim to be an expert but have tried to improve the rendering of some of the text. --A12n 23:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dating?

edit

This article states that the city was originally founded at Djenné-Jeno in 300 CE, but the Djenné-Jeno article itself says 250 BC instead. Which of these dates is correct? Looking at the out-links, the World Heritage site says 250 BC. The outlinks from the Djenné-Jeno also say it was first settled in the 3rd Century BC, but are unclear when the settlement first became urban in scope. From the scholarly "Antiquity of Man" site it looks like Djenné-Jeno was urban starting in Phase II (40-400 D) or at least by year 400. -- 209.162.56.40 18:53, 29 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Adobe & Mud brick

edit

There is a slow-moving discussion on these two articles and whether they should be merged. I personally don't see that the difference is clear enough to merit separate articles and references unless the whole discussion of earthen building is restructured (see my remarks in the discussion sections of those articles). However I would like to insist that the mention of the Great Mosque in this article have refereces to both. --A12n 23:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

History Channel video as a source

edit

I've removed the inline citation to support the claim that Djenne is the oldest known town in sub-Saharan Africa. "Heaven on Earth: Islam", November 23, 2004 video documentary, History Channel. Producer/director, Stephen Rooke. Scriptwriter/host: Christy Kenneally. TV documentaries are usually unsuitable as sources of information for Wikipedia. Aa77zz (talk) 13:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sack of Ghana etc

edit

The article contains this statement:

"The sack of the Ghana Empire by the Almoravids in 1076 allowed Djenné to surge forward as a major town in the region."

The belief that the Ghana Empire was sacked by the Almoravids has been discredited. For the lack of evidence see: Fisher, Humphery J. (1982), "Review: Early Arabic Sources and the Almoravid Conquest of Ghana – Review of Corpus of Early Arabic Sources for West African History by J. F. P. Hopkins ; N. Levtzion", Journal of African History, 23 (4): 549–560, JSTOR 182041

For the historiology see: Masonen, Pekka; Fisher, Humphrey J. (1996), "Not Quite Venus from the Waves: The Almoravid Conquest of Ghana in the Modern Historiography of Western Africa", History in Africa, 23: 197–232, JSTOR 3171941


This text is in a note:

"Between the 11th and 13th C., Arab sources identified Djenné as the dominant commercial center of west Africa, the major terminus of the gold, salt and slave trade of the Trans-Saharan trade route."

I believe this is incorrect - there is no mention of Djenné in the Arab sources of this period. This is discussed by the McIntoshes (1981) who write: "The failure of any Arab or European source prior to the mid-fifteenth century to mention the town by name has convinced various historians of the Western Sudan that Jenne did not exist substantially prior to this time."


"Djenné brief period of dominance came to an end in the 13th C., with the rise of the Mali Empire," There are no sources for this period. Aa77zz (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Djenné. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Djenné. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Djenné. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Djenné. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply