Talk:DnaI

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Dubious

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I'm concerned about this stub after looking at J. M. Lackie (2007). The dictionary of cell and molecular biology (4th ed.). Academic Press. p. 128. ISBN 0123739861. It seems that dnaI is an E. coli gene and that dnaT is a protein? Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

dnaI/dnaT is a gene, DnaI/DnaT is a protein. In bacteria, genes are named according to their function and their order of discovery in particular species (it is actually a very annoying system when you compare genes between species and they have different names, or different genes have the same name!). The prefix Dna- refers to DNA replication and repair enzymes, while the dna- prefix (note the change of case) refers to the respective gene that encodes them. In Gram positive species DnaI (encoded by the dnaI gene) is involved in replication initiation. In Gram negative species (e.g. E. coli) dnaI/dnaT (don't worry about the naming) refers to a different gene, for which the protein it encodes is also involved in initiation of DNA replication. 115.64.56.117 (talk) 09:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm not really sure a page here is necessary. The Gram positive DnaI is reasonably well characterised, and anyone looking for information will find it on the PDB, Pubmed or KEGG. 115.64.56.117 (talk) 09:56, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I see, thanks! Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Interesting Article

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've found an interesting article on dnaB and dnaI screening temperature-sensitive replication mutants in S. aureus. The authors show that "dnaB and dnaI mutants were unable to initiate DNA replication at restrictive temperatures, which is similar to previous findings in Bacillus subtilis." A fraction of the dnaI mutant cells halted DNA replication and some were even sensitive to mitomycin C, which causes DNA lesions. ^[1]

Reference:

^ Li, Yan (20). "dnaB and dnaI temperature-sensitive mutants of Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for involvement of DnaB and DnaI in synchrony regulation of chromosome replication". Microbiology. 153 (10): 3370–3379. PMID 17906136. Retrieved 2 October 2012. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Regards, ShanSabri (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[dnaB_and_dnaI-1] Li, Yan (20). "dnaB and dnaI temperature-sensitive mutants of Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for involvement of DnaB and DnaI in synchrony regulation of chromosome replication". Microbiology. 153 (10): 3370–3379. PMID 17906136. Retrieved 2 October 2012. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

[1]