Talk:Doctor Who series 9/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 22:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Hey, I'll be reviewing this article. I'll have my assessment by tomorrow. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Basic stuff and comments

• Infobox and the article's lead are great. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
• Episode descriptions are well-written. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
• I've noticed that the other GA-articles on the series also have a separate "Casting" section, so that's good. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
• In development, I'm not quite sure why the word "cliffhanger" is linked until its third use, so I suggest removing the link, and adding it to its first use in the sentence: "Before series 8 began, Moffat promised a cliffhanger for series 9". Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
• In writing, "Flatline" should be linked to its article as it's in a new section. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
• Also in writing, could you add a reference to support the sentence ending with: "though this was removed at a later date"? Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
• The filming section is consistent so that passes. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
• The section titled "Broadcast" should be expanded per MOS:TVRELEASE. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
• Home media, print, reception, critical response, awards, and soundtrack sections all pass criteria found in MOS:TV. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done Linking "cliffhanger" fixed.
  •  Done Linking "Flatline" fixed.
  •  Done Added source to "though this was removed at a later date" sentence. The source is the same one used to source the first half of the same sentence, but at a future archive date (four days later), showing its removal.
  •  Doing... Fixing Broadcast section.
  • -- /Alex/₂₁ 04:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done Expanded Broadcast section.
  • @Some Dude From North Carolina: All issues fixed. -- /Alex/₂₁ 05:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·