Talk:Doctrine of bias in Singapore law
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ukexpat in topic Biased title
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in April 2010. Further details are available here. |
| This article was the subject of an educational assignment in September 2011. Further details are available here. |
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Talk:Doctrine of bias in Singapore law/Smuconlaw version was copied or moved into Doctrine of bias in Singapore law with this edit on 20:16, 2 January 2013. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | A fact from Doctrine of bias in Singapore law appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Biased title
editthe title suggests singapore law is biased —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.189.218.107 (talk) 06:32, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- I see what you mean, but I'm not sure whether we can come up with another suitable title. — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps Bias doctrine in Singapore law or something similar? – ukexpat (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Good idea. Or "Doctrine of bias in Singapore law"? I'm fine with either option. Thanks. — SMUconlaw (talk) 16:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps Bias doctrine in Singapore law or something similar? – ukexpat (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Let's go with that - "Doctrine of..." seems to be the usual form for similar articles. I'll do the move now. – ukexpat (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Done – ukexpat (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2010 (UTC)