Talk:Docusign
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
July 2012
editI'm curious if any of this article's content is even relevant? Even after I trimmed some of the fat, it still is pretty much just pointless. What it really needs is a list of platforms (iPhone, Android, etc) and some of the actual signing features they offer. Visiting their website, I see lots of info about a product called "Ink". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.21.39.222 (talk) 01:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
You are correct. This article is of very low quality. It needs much improvement to be a Good Article. Auchansa (talk) 04:04, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
"Ink" is the term for some of the mobile apps, but the company seems to be moving away from this term as of March-2014. (Disclosure: I a DocuSign employee. I have not and will not edit the page but thought providing information to the talk page would be acceptable, but please let me know if this violates best practices here. I definitely do not want to introduce bias. Much <3 to you Wikipedians)8.20.114.10 (talk) 01:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
NPOV & Advertising/Promotion Violations
editThe article in question violates core Wikipedia polices:
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Special_note:_advertising_and_promotion
Looking at the article's history, the majority of the article's content was the direct result of a single user, MountainMan11, who has since been blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia.
The diff between the article pre and post MountainMan11 not only added violating content, but also removed all content unfavorable to the company (Lawsuits section and Competitors section). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.101.105 (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I rolled it back. Whatever is worth keeping may be pulled up from the history should anyone desire. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on DocuSign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140108032217/http://www.dailymarkets.com/stock/2013/01/10/equifax-and-docusign-help-the-irs-accelerate-forms-processing-with-esignature/ to http://www.dailymarkets.com/stock/2013/01/10/equifax-and-docusign-help-the-irs-accelerate-forms-processing-with-esignature/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on DocuSign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120707210947/http://www.docusign.com:80/blog/2009/07/10/work-smarter-with-a-tool-your-mom-can-use to http://www.docusign.com/blog/2009/07/10/work-smarter-with-a-tool-your-mom-can-use/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on DocuSign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170106104147/http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/10/09/docusign-keith-krach/ to http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/10/09/docusign-keith-krach/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)