Talk:Dog Days Are Over

Image copyright problem with File:DogDaysAreOver F&M.jpg

The image File:DogDaysAreOver F&M.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dog Days Are Over. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109130126/http://www.musicomh.com/singles/florence-and-the-machine-2_1108.htm to http://www.musicomh.com/singles/florence-and-the-machine-2_1108.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130413030039/http://v.youku.com:80/v_show/id_XNTM0NDg2NzQw.html to http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNTM0NDg2NzQw.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

R&B?

Like the headline says, seriously R&B? In what alternative world is this song an R&B song? Penpaperpencil (Talk) 13:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dog Days Are Over. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100405063244/http://florenceandthemachine.net/news/0-6/watch-flo-on-alan-carr/0-6 to http://florenceandthemachine.net/news/0-6/watch-flo-on-alan-carr/0-6/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Possible meaning of this song

I speculate about this song without any authority, and without liking it. It may be meant to be distressed and crazy sounding.

Happiness appears to be a would-be "happy" pregnancy that was coming at her with no turning back. She tries to hide it, but ends up killing it (the fetus) with symbolic kisses. More explicitly she seems to have sunk or drowned the fetus in the sink, even witnessing bubbles. She finally got rid of it (the fetus) down the kitchen sink--down the disposal. Later she appears to be going crazy; she hears things that others do not. There's a pounding in her head that she interprets as horses coming; when others are asked if they can hear it, there's no answer. They can't hear it; it's just her.

The song speaks of running (one's life) for various relatives that are listed out. Absent from the list is any sense of spouse or boyfriend. So who got her pregnant? The first pregnancy in the song suggests that she was in a sexual "train". Later, there appears to be a second pregnancy by someone in a high place of authority, perhaps an educator that should have known better. The Dog Days suggest that the pregnancy came doggie style and more graphically, it came at her like a bullet in the back. The song suggests an impending second abortion from the idea that she can't "carry" it (the fetus) to term if she's going to survive. The Dog Days (of summer) being over may suggest that she is about to return to school and face her educator again. The narrator suggests that he should run.

We may not know who actually wrote the song. I'm happy to be wrong if there's a cleaner interpretation. 2601:681:5B00:45E0:B935:5651:FF7A:6DFF (talk) 15:34, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Starting "In pop culture" section?

There article does not contain a section for appearances of the song "In Pop Culture". The appearance of the song Guardians of the Galaxy caused the song to reenter the charts so it is covered in the charts section.

An editor tried to add information about the song being featured in the video game Fortnite but it was inappropriate to add this information to the lead section (undue emphasis) and without any references. I'm not sure how noteworthy it is that the song featured in the video game Fortnite Festival, but I've found a source to WP:VERIFY [1][2] but Gamesradar didn't even think it was among the 10 best songs in the game.[3]

I don't think it is worth starting a section in the article body to contain any other such pop culture references just yet, but maybe if there were more this might be included too. -- 193.178.96.170 (talk) 13:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Instrumentation

A reviewer seemed to think the song used "reverbed ukulele" [4] while a live performances[5][6] seem to suggest a harp was actually used. Can anyone confirm if the song originally included a harpist in the studio version? It would be good if this article could include a description of the instrumentation used, perhaps as part of the background section. -- 193.178.96.170 (talk) 12:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

I see the album credits harp, viola, and violin, use on the track, so it would seem the reviewer was mistaken about ukelele being used on this track. -- 193.178.96.170 (talk) 13:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)