Talk:Doing It (novel)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sac304.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Doing It (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006104142/http://events.latimes.com/festivalofbooks/bookprizes-2004/ to http://events.latimes.com/festivalofbooks/bookprizes-2004/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Wikipedians,
Does anyone have sources to cite for the plot summary? Sac304 (talk) 20:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sources and References
- In this article none of the facts are backed up by citations, excluding one. The only source cited is the Los Angeles Times, and the link to the source does not work. The lack of sources does not reflect available literature on the topic, and creates an untrustworthy article. The information in the summary section and the controversy section should be justified with academic sources.Emilyc6411 (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)