Talk:Dojang

dojo

I added the information that Dojang is the Korean equivalent of Japanese dojo because dojo is a much more popular word and people nay wonder what the difference between the two. User:Kuebie called it "vandalism" although it is only a content dispute, not a vandalism. I stated the reason why I added the information. It is cited too. I believe there's no reason to remove it.--Michael Friedrich (talk) 06:29, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Edit Warring

I'm not impressed by the low-grade edit war going on--it stops now. The source says essentially what the the disputed source indicates. If anyone wants to dispute that "dojang" is equivalent to "dojo", then let that debate be held HERE and with competing reliable sources, not with the use of the undo button. Jclemens (talk) 02:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

please consider that dojang is also used for professional private go/baduk schools. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.244.31.91 (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dojang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610073647/http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?i=129475 to http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?i=129475

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)