Talk:Doki Doki Literature Club!/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: OliverEastwood (talk · contribs) 04:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Overall an excellent article. All criteria were met, and the article demonstrates a high standard of writing. The article is a bit wordy, however, this is to be expected from video game articles and doesn't cause the article to become any less focused. - OliverEastwood (talk) 04:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)