Talk:Dol Guldur/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Surprisingly good article for a topic that is not major in the books.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   still needs work; see closing statement/note.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   A few things appear to be borderline OR, but I noted them through a {{fact}} template or a <!--...--> note...so I think that you will fix them.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   This is written in a partly in-universe style for some, but considering that it's kinda hard not to (with Tolkien's legendarium) I'll pass it.

   B. Focused:

   Veered off a bit at points, but I believe that I fixed them with my edits.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Could use a few more images, but there just aren't many out there for this kind of article; I know this from my experience with Shannara articles.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Please work on the prose; I fixed some but not all--I've read LotR, but not as indepth as this, so I can't change a few parts bacause I don't know what happened in the books, and I don't want to change the meaning of a sentence so that I give a false history. Very, very informative and an interesting read. the_ed17 14:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Today

As of today the article looks like this at GA. Lord of Moria _Talk ^Contribs 14:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC)