Talk:Dolbeault cohomology
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ale.rossi91 in topic Dolbeault-Grothendieck lemma ?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dolbeault cohomology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Perhaps adding that on the construction of the Dolbeault cohomology one has to use the complex structure of the manifold and then remarking if the cohomology groups obtained give information about the complex structure (or if it is only a topological invariant) would enrich the entry.
in particular, if the Dolbeault cohomology is an invariant of the complex structure, then would be nice to have an example of two complex structures on the same differentiable manifold yielding different Dolbeault cohomology groups.
Who was Dolbeault ?
editThe article has no biographical reference to Dolbeault. Can anyone help? DFH 20:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Dolbeault-Grothendieck lemma ?
editWhat is the Dolbeault-Grothendieck lemma ? DFH 20:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- I added a paragraph on the Dolbeault_cohomology#Dolbeault-Grothendieck_lemma here. Is it better to create a new article on the topic and just link it here? The proofs are quite long, but the Dolbeault cohomology and the Dolbeault-Grothendieck lemma are strictly related; what's more without this paragraph the article seemed really poor. --Ale.rossi91 (talk) 02:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)