This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Appropriate for me to review this since not only have we collaborated before, but the GA backlog is going on right now! --K. Peake11:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
"era and was released in" → "era, being released in"
Done, changed
"legs of their" → "legs of the group's"
Done, changed
"Upon release, the EP debuted at number nine in on" → "The EP debuted at number nine on" and this should be moved to being the last sentence of the second paragraph instead
✗Not done, in context of the rest of the lead it doesn't make sense as the second and third paragraph flow together. I would normally agree otherwise.
"second single and is a" → "second single, which is a"
Done, changed
"peaking in the top ten on" → "peaking in the top 10 of"
Done, changed
"Australia but in the UK it peaked at number 17 and in the US at number 73." → "Australia, though it reached number 17 in the UK and number 73 in the United States."
Done, changed
"Both songs attracted controversy" → ""Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)" and "Hush Hush; Hush Hush" both attracted controversy"
"an interview Billboard magazine's" → "an interview with Billboard magazine's"
Done, changed
"He called Doll Domination" → "He called the album"
Done, changed
"had sold 400,000 copies" → "had sold less than 400,000 copies"
Done, changed
"was on the way called" → "was set to be released under the title of"
Done, changed
"In comparison, the group's first album..." this sentence is not only incorrect because that article is from 2008, but it also off topic since there is no mention of Doll Domination in that article whatsoever
Not sure what you mean, this sentence is about the previous album, serving as a comparison between the sales of PCD versus Doll Domination.
I am aware it is used to compare the sales of the two albums, but this is trivial since the source about PCD not only offers no mention of the other album, but it is from a different period in time. --K. Peake07:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
The info about "Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)" does not appear to be backed up at all
I followed the principles of WP:CITE, its a fact that "Jai Ho!" features Nicole Scherzinger. its in the single listings, the cover art etc. This doesn't need sourcing?
"...follow up single "Hush Hush; Hush Hush" also initially listed the singer" → ""Hush Hush; Hush Hush" initially listed Scherzinger"
Done
Remove wikilink on The Circus Starring Britney Spears
The Writing Camp and Brick & Lace should both only be targeted to on the first mention of the members here
Not sure what you mean, but its standard practice to link each member of the group
Rahman → A. R. Rahman under producers, with the wikilink
Done
Target Theron Thomas to R. City and remove target on Timothy Thomas
Done
Elliott → Missy Elliott under songwriters, with the wikilink
Done
Remove target to Quiz & Larossi for Josef Larossi
See previous comment
Notes and samples should be subheadings, not subsections
Done
"He's Always There" as written by Jim McCarty and Paul Samwell-Smith performed → "He's Always There", as written by Jim McCarty and Paul Samwell-Smith, and performed
Done
"Je M'appelle Jane" as written by Mickael Furnon performed → "Je M'appelle Jane", as written by Mickael Furnon and performed
Done
"I Will Survive" as written by Freddie Perren and Dino Fekaris and → "I Will Survive", as written by Freddie Perren and Dino Fekaris, and an
Done
by David Blumberg performed → by David Blumberg, as performed
The imgs here are not needed, since it is not required for pics of so many musicians
✗Not done, there's no set standard for what can and can't be done and its unusual for us to be able to have images for all of the personnel involved. I see no issue with this.
You should not have these tables; lay it out like most credits and personnel sections plus instead put (track...) for people's credits with the numbers in the brackets rather than separate tracks
"the group's debut album" → "the group's debut studio album"
Done
"70,000 copies[62] and was certified silver" → "70,000 copies in the UK." moving [62] to the end of the sentence and remove [63], since it was later certified gold so silver is non-notable
Done
"the release was certified Gold," → "the EP was certified gold by the British Phonographic Industry (BPI)" with the wikilink
Done removed
On hold but one issue I noticed throughout the review was that you have been heavily overlinking in this article. --K. Peake 21:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)