Talk:Dominator (roller coaster)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleDominator (roller coaster) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 9, 2012Good article nomineeListed


Major issue with grammar

edit

"Although Dominator contains the world's largest vertical loop, that loop is not the tallest roller coaster inversion in the world or even the tallest inversion on any of Kings Dominion's roller coasters."

This sentence is located in the first paragraph. This sentence also does not make sense. Could someone who knows about the Dominator's records please rewrite/reword this sentence so that it makes sense? I propose the following in the mean time:

"Although Dominator contains the world's largest vertical loop in diameter, the aforementioned loop is not the tallest roller coaster inversion in the world, as defined as track which suspends riders upside down, and is measured in distance from the inversion to the ground. The loop is also not even the tallest roller coaster loop in Kings Dominion."

Please, if you have any revisions, or you support this proposed sentence, please post below. GREATLY APPRECIATED! WingedYoshi - Talk to me! 01:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:BatmanKFlogo.gif

edit
 

Image:BatmanKFlogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.


Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Dominator (roller coaster)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 02:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I will be reviewing this article. Comments will come within the hour. Looking forward to working with you.
Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 02:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!--Astros4477 (talk) 02:07, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • Fine.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  • Neutral.
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  • Stable.
  1. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  • All images look fine.
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Once these comments are addressed, I will re-evaluate the article.
Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 02:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have addressed all your comments.--Astros4477 (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for being quick with addressing. I will look over the article again, and I will give you an answer in about an hour or two.
Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 06:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dominator (roller coaster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply