Talk:Don 2/Archive 1

satellite rights

the satellite rights for don 2 were sold to zee television network for 37 crores.Sanjaytirur (talk) 08:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Tidbit

Khan became the only Indian actor to have successfully shot a film sequence in Germany, a country that is infamous for denying requests of international film shoots. A production executive stated that "Unlike the US, UK and Thailand, it isn’t easy to obtain permission to shoot in Germany. The rules are very strict and in order to be eligible one needs to clear at least 47 points out of 60 [...] Shah Rukh Khan is so famous in Germany and that made a great difference to shoot Don 2 there". Sidhwani said, "We are the first Indian film which has managed to do that. There were certain pre-conditions that we were required to meet and we had to be very careful. Eventually they did open the doors for us. Once we were together on making the film, they proved to be extremely helpful." [29] — Preceding unsignedcomment added by Sen arun (talk •contribs) 10:28, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

The tidbit about Don 2 being the first Bollywood film filmed in Germany is definitely not true. One counter example is "Aap Kaa Suroor -- The Moviee" from 2007, which was shot mainly in Germany. Lots of the scenes were taken in Stuttgart.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aap_Ka_Suroor_-_The_Real_Love_Story — Preceding unsigned comment added by92.224.229.190 (talk) 21:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

You are absolutely right but I don't see it being mentioned anywhere in the article that it is the "first film" to be shot there. X.One ^SOS 14:55, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 23 December 2011

like this says Don 2 get mixed reviews:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Critics-verdict-Don-2-gets-mixed-reports/Article1-786010.aspx(Critics' verdict: Don 2 gets mixed reports)

why you not mention negative and mixed review:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Reviews/Mayank-Shekhar-s-review-Don-2/Article1-786223.aspxHindustan Times 1.5 star

http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/review_the-after-hrs-review-don2_1629306

--Ali

We're doing our best to write all the reviews up. I'm writing them up as we speak. I just woke up Ali, give me some time. I'm going as fast as I can. --Asher Madan 15:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added byAshermadan (talk •contribs)

The first Bollywood film to be shot in Germany is Humraah, The Traitor. Aap Ka Suroorwas shot later. — Precedingunsigned comment added by59.182.48.169 (talk) 13:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

More reviews

Plz add this also:

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/masand-don-2-is-spectacularly-boring/214570-47-84.html - 'Don 2' is spectacularly boring

http://www.mid-day.com/entertainment/2011/dec/231211-Don-2-movie-review-Shah-Rukh-Khan.htm - It's time for the SRK fans to go weak in the knees again

http://www.sify.com/movies/bollywood/review.php?id=14986476&ctid=5&cid=2425 - Where's Don? This is a con

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111224/jsp/entertainment/story_14921919.jsp - SHAH RUKH ‘SEXY TWISTED’ DON TRIUMPHS OVER A LOOSE PLOT

http://www.deccanchronicle.com/channels/showbiz/bollywood/don-2-review-what-yawn-2-879 - Don 2 review: What a Yawn 2!

http://www.stargold.in/newsdetails.aspx?nid=2741 - Why was Don 2 made?

Negative review overseas also:

http://m.ibtimes.com/don-2-review-shah-rukh-khan-bollywood-271901.html

You must be fair. These all frm famous sources.

--Ali

Ok, we have to sleep and do other things to. It's not like we're getting paid! We have also never used Star Gold's reviews because of consistency issues in the past. I have added all the reviews you asked me to. I did not add the INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES review because they lifted it from another review we posted earlier. They did not write that review just copied one! --Asher Madan 05:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC) — Precedingunsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk • contribs)

Edit request on 24 December 2011

Collection : rs. 15cr Amandon8 (talk) 07:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

 Already done: The actual figure is ₹13.50 crore (US$1.6 million). -- KarthikNadar 07:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Don 2 opening day was 15 cr and there are alot of sources supporting this figure. Check Taran Adarsh tweets where he states 15 cr as opening day and then these following links say the same from Komal Nahta, Economic Times and Box Office India.co.in

http://www.boxofficeindia.co.in/at-14-cr-plus-don-2-is-third-highest-grosser-2011/ http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/don-2-friday-box-office-rs-15-crore-net/ http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/media/entertainment-/entertainment/shah-rukh-khans-don-2-grosses-rs-15-crore-on-day-1/articleshow/11227791.cms

please edit this. — Precedingunsigned comment added by109.124.145.30 (talk) 11:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

 Done: -- Karthik Nadar 12:44, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

you already have done it? because it still says 13.5 cr opening day or as in you will not do it because...? If you guys do change it to 15 cr which is what it should be since many are supporting it then Don 2 effectively becomes the 2nd or 3rd highest opening day

• I think 15 crore is a somewhat correct figure-->source form zee news site-->http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/movies/rs-15-crore-for-don-2-on-day-1_102724.htm

.There is a minor spelling mistake in the box office section which says "nett" which should be actually "net".There is something about only autoconfirmed users capable of editing this page which prevented me from doing the change myself. Vivekananda De--tAlK 13:41, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

just saw that you guys changed it to 15 cr, which is somewhat accurate. Maybe you should change it under the box office section of the article as well as it still says 13.5 cr — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 109.124.145.30 (talk) 13:54, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

 Done: --Vivekananda De--tAlK 14:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 24 December 2011

Edit 1st day collection in the Box office section. It is 15 crores. Also, this more than Dabangg. So, it should read it is the highest non-holiday first day earner! It was 14.50 for Dabangg. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dabangg 123.252.214.232 (talk) 13:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

yeah 15 cr would probably make it 2nd or 3rd highest opening day depending on how you look at Ra.One and highest non-holiday opening as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by109.124.145.30 (talk) 14:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Wikipedia is not a reliable third party source. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 19:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Don 2 Box Office Opening

Who said 4th highest opening and 2nd highest non-holiday grosser? 13.85 crores + 60-70 lakhs = 14.45-14.55 crores. This is higher than Dabangg. DO NOT INCLUDE HINDI ONLY, INCLUDE THE TAMIL AND TELUGU VERSION AS WELL. THE SOURCE IS FROM BOX OFFICE INDIA SO IT IS ACCEPTABLE. WE CAN DO BASIC MATH RIGHT? --Asher Madan 16:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk • contribs)

plz edit the nett weekend gross..its 48.3 crores http://ibnlive.in.com/news/don-2-gathers-rs-48-crore-in-opening-weekend/215161-8.html — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 117.205.25.29 (talk) 10:30, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

We did it, take a look. --Asher Madan 08:43, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Box Office India Errors

BOI said "Don falls huge on monday collected 6.5cr" later updated it to 7.25cr. Now they took that down and said 7.20cr. What is going on? Did you guys see this? Why did the site do this? I don't think that they should be trusted in this the case of Don 2 because these mistakes are HUGE.--Asher Madan 08:43, 27 December 2011 (UTC) — Precedingunsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk • contribs)

They do make mistake, but they are very reliable source because they update the proper info at the best. -- Karthik Nadar 10:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

lets use IBOS it not made mistakes. it says Don 2 flops:

http://www.ibosnetwork.com/newsmanager/templates/template1.aspx?a=22309&z=4

even ndtv said "Making profit on the movie seems impossible at this point in time"

http://movies.ndtv.com/movie_story.aspx?Section=Movies&ID=ENTEN20110190960&subcatg=MOVIESINDIA&keyword=bollywood&nid=161070&cp

i'm with box office india

--Ali

IBOS is not reliable ALI, and NDTV is also not a reliable source. SORRY! The film has already recovered it's budget when you look at nett collections worldwide and many sources will soon announce that it's a hit. You need to stop being a fanboy of Salmon Kahn and stop pestering us with random unreliable sources. Get a life dude, seriously. — Precedingunsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk • contribs) 16:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

you get a life and stop attacks. i said only i'm with box office india. even bbc made mistakes. where r u? ndtv is a leading television. we have article about:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NDTV

i see actually you are fanboy of shah rukh.as

you dont right to erase comments

--Ali

We just use BOX OFFICE INDIA OR THE DISTRIBUTOR DATA IF BOX OFFICE INDIA IS NOT AVAILABLE. IN THIS CASE WE'RE ALSO USING KOMAL NAHTA BECAUSE HE'S PROVIDING TAMIL AND TELUGU FIGURES WHICH BOX OFFICE INDIA ISN'T. READ THE GUIDELINES FOR WIKIPEDIA. I DONT WANT TO WASTE MORE TIME LOOKING AT YOUR SOURCES THAT ARE JUST COMPLETELY OFF. --Asher Madan 17:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I think you guys should update the Box Office section as Taran Adarsh just shared updated actuals for Don 2's business up untill Tuesday.

1. Don2 - India *actuals*: Fri 15.55 cr, Sat 15.32 cr, Sun 18.22 cr, Mon 8.85 cr, Tue 7.02 cr. Total: Rs 64.96 cr [incl Tamil + Telugu].

This is taken from Taran Adarsh's twitter page and there is no way this is not accurate as Taran Adarsh works in the trade and almost always reports accurate figures. Also we know now that there is something wrong with Box Office Indias figures as they are always lower than others. — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 109.124.145.30 (talk) 17:54, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Real Name

All this changing back and forth of the names, please.... Has anyone determined what the official name of the film really is? I suspect it is just Don 2 period. Look at the website: "don2thefilm", title "Don 2", and its content. Lots of "Don 2", but no "Chase", no "King", sometimes "Don 2 - A film by Faran Akhtar". I think those slogans are just tag lines, but not a part of the title. Can we change the article name to just Don 2? Comments please.BollyJeff || talk22:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

I agree. A lot of confusion over "The chase continues" and "The King is back" has been lingering over the past few months. As the official site does not mention any such thing, there is no need for such a caption. Why don't we start a page move request? More opinions can be formally expressed. X.One ^SOS 07:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm moving the page. I did taught the same earlier. If any dispute occurs, then we will have a debate on it. -- Karthik Nadar 10:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

That would be an appropriate move in this instance. Joyson Prabhu ^{Holla at me!} 10:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Page couldn't be moved, need an admin help. -- Karthik Nadar 10:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

YDone, per above and the request on my talk page. Let me know if there are further issues. CT Cooper · talk 12:52, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Removed unsupported claim that SRK is only third actor to film in Germany

The article previously claimed SRK "joined Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt to become only the third actor able to obtain filming permission in Germany." The source given doesn't claim this; what it says is that "he also joins the likes of Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt"; that is, it is giving Cruise and Pitt as examples, it is not saying that they are the only actors who are in the same category. The source goes on to say "these are the only two major superstars who have managed to impress the German authorities when it comes to shooting an international film in their land." I'm not exactly sure what it means to say that these actors have "impressed" the German authorities, but it's quite clear that this sentence does not mean that these are the only two actors to have obtained permission to film in Germany. It's not surprising that the source doesn't say that, because it's obviously false: many foreign films are shot in Germany.

Please fix it. BollyJeff || talk13:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Don 2 box office report

Don 2 current box office is about 143.91 crore [Nett 10 days worldwide] [US$27.01 million dollar]. Information from this site http://boxofficereport.net/topics/don-2-box-office-collections/ — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 58.137.27.12 (talk) 07:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Don 2 collections in 4 weeks Worldwide Collections(gross) – 222 crore source-http://boxofficereport.net/don-2-four-weeks-worldwide-collections/ — Preceding unsigned comment added byDhirajpremani (talk •contribs) 08:02, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

What is going on here ?

Now a Taran Adarsh tweet or whatever and the worst box-offfice site "bollywoodhungama.com" are being used by the wikipedia editors to give out the box-office collections on Don2 . God saves wiki now . Why do you guys want wiki to be a doomed site ? Please guys , it is a request to whoever is editing this page to take down these figures with immediate effect because taran/komal are not at all reliable ; furthermore they are frowned upon in trade circles. Please do the above OR i will have to bring in several editors here to take down these pathetic crude figures OR i will have to request a block for you guys . Thanks . Seeta mayya (talk) 23:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

 Not done I am sorry to say but "bollywoodhungama.com" is a reliable source. If you could kindly read Wikipedia regulations and guides then you may understand. And please note this, you are not allowed to request a block on anyone for this because your request is invalid.

Thank you User:sonataca

Could you please tell me even a single wiki page on a bollywood movie that uses that idiot Taran and bollywoodhungama.com for box-office collections to be used that too in the main INFOBOX of such a big and huge project like Don2 . BOI only has to be used as the official source for bo nos. on wiki , else a report to the admin is bound to happen sooner or later . And it is a request not to even dare to try undoing my edits in future . Thanks Seeta mayya (talk) 23:55, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, please check 'Bodyguard' and 'Ready' pages. User:sonataca —Preceding undated comment added 00:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC).

Are you a kid ? Did you urself check the main infobox of these 2 bg and ready ? here it is for u kid : 229cr and 179cr worldwide gross strictly according to BOI .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ready_(2011_film)#cite_note-worldwide-3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodyguard_(2011_Hindi_film)#cite_note-worldwide-2

U seriously are a kid . LOL . But it's okay i guess . Now i have already reported for a block on Meryam90 .Thanks .Seeta mayya (talk) 00:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Madam, if you see this:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Bollywood_Hungama BH is still considered a reliable source for Wikipedia. Please undo your block on that editor.sonataca

There is no Block, nor there is even a request for it...--Meryam90 (talk) 00:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

LOL . Now wiki editors are unaware where to even check for blocks ? Sorry to say Sir sonataca , but I have been humiliated enough by this editor who is quite dishonest , inconsiderate and rude to every wiki editor she talks to . It seems she just has a personal vendetta of some sort against me and many others since ages .So please STOP defending her . BTW , your reference was , i should say , highly highly useless . Hail Don SRK. Thanks .Seeta mayya (talk) 00:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I don't like these people's attitude, but here are some facts as I see them: We usually depend on Box Office India for these figures They are showing about 96 crores (71 India + ~25 crores rest of world) for first week earnings when looking at these sources:India,rest. Is there a good reason not to use these figures instead of someone's tweet? BollyJeff || talk 01:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes , BollyJeff || talkI have the same problem with this editor Meryam90 (talk) who considers herself a God at wikipedia . This is height of ridiculous behaviour as i cannot even fathom how can anyone allow tweets of Taran-the worst trade expert of India and his pathetic site BH to be used for bo figures , that too on the info-box . When i delete the box-office gross based on a tweet ..lol .. she tries to harass me . Help . Thanks .Seeta mayya(talk) 01:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I am not defending anyone. And you do realize that BOI updates mostly Indian figures daily. Taran of BH updates but with international figures as well. Don 2 had a worldwide release and not just in India. And as far as I can see, I have not come across BOI's article on current figures (Intl. + Indian). Next thing I want to say is Don 2 is still running in theaters, the figures in the INFOBOX will keep changing, whether daily or weekly. The final figure may not come from BH but BOI, it's still early to say and making a issue about it now is not legit. Thanks sonataca — Preceding unsigned comment added bySonataca (talk •contribs) 01:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Please have a look at BollyJeff || talkcomment above for LINKS TO the latest updates on BOI regarding Don2 . Why can't that editor be a bit sensible ? And u don't need to tell me where is the movie running . I can tell you the names of all countries where it is running . So , please enjoy your new-year and let me do the same . Thanks .Seeta mayya (talk) 01:26, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Of course it will change; I think folks should not get so angry about this. Seeta should not attack Meryam, etc. However, since there is a precedent for using BOI for Bollywood film earnings, and I have provided links to their estimates of both India and overseas earnings, maybe we could go with that for now. What do you say? BollyJeff || talk 01:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Jeff (may I call you Jeff?) I know but on Ra.One page and Rockstar page, I noticed that the final figure on the INFOBOX is not from BOI but from TOI and CNN-IBN. I do understand that BOI has been the primary source for most wikipedia Indian cinema pages but BH (strictly Taran and not Komal, Komal is from KOIMOI) has given the latest figures of the past weekend which unfortunately BOI hasn't YET. I hope BOI gives update on it soon so this discussion can come to an end. — Preceding unsigned comment added bySonataca (talk •contribs) 01:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I believe they gave second weekend here. Anyway, fix it as soon as you can, because the infobox says week one only, and using a tweet from this guy as the main source looks bad.BollyJeff || talk01:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hey BollyJeff || talkPlease you do it . Thanks .Seeta mayya (talk) 01:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Jeff, I checked the article and it does not give a full figure. But do whatever you like...since both of you don't like my attitude, I will just stay away from Wikipedia. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added bySonataca (talk •contribs) 02:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok, Seeta Mayya, you need to stop this. You're insutling a lot of people, like Sonataca and Meryam90. The infobox is supposed to include WORLDWIDE GROSS (not nett but gross worldwide). BOI has only been supplying us with Hindi figures and they have been estimating the Tamil and Telugu figures. They have not even bothered to give international data. Bollywood Hungama is considered a valid source and we will continue to use it because it provides WORLDWIDE DATA. I agree with Sonataca and Meryam90. Please don't abuse to use a condescending tone here. I warned you before about such behavior but now you're back to it again. It's a damn shame. Asher Madan --Asher Madan 03:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC) — Precedingunsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk • contribs)

Ok Asher , my tone is perfectly in norms with Wiki rules . Please check out that the links being provided here from BOI are authentic enough to correctly give tamil/telugu versions also . Moreover , do you seriously think a tweet from a pathetic trade analyst like Taran should be used on a prestigious site like wiki ? Look at BollyJeff || talk comments and there has been a wide consensus on BOI . Then if u look closely u will find that the previous figures posted byMeryam90 (talk) were also nett . ThanksSeeta mayya (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Actually, the source does say "Don 2 (Hindi)" so maybe it doesn't include other languages.BollyJeff || talk03:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

To BollyJeff || talkplease check the link i have given ; it states don2 figures including tamil/telugu versions clearly . Just check the reference again . U're mistaken here . Thanks .Seeta mayya(talk) 03:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

No it doesn't. I agree with Meryam that we should remove it from the infobox until the film is out of theatres and final figures come in. This updating it everyday is just silly.BollyJeff || talk13:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I checked the link too. IT DOESN'T. WHAT ON EARTH ARE YOU READING? LIKE ARE YOU HALLUCINATING OR SOMETHING? SEEING WORDS. IT DOESNT! --Asher Madan 08:49, 4 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added byAshermadan (talk •contribs)

Box Office

Why did someone change the box office numbers back to 119.18 crore? Don 2 has made 144.87 crore worldwide so far in two weeks. Please update the box office! --Trishstar7 (talk) 04:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

The site you are providing the link for is not considered a reliable site as per wikipedia rules . Only Boxofficeindia.com figures can be taken into account . Sorry . Thanks .Seeta mayya (talk) 05:41, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, as per boxofficeindia.com record, the collection is around 94.5 crore at the end of 10 days.Also the overseas collection is 50 + crore(As mentioned in overseas box office collection column on this page).So the total collection would be around 144.5 cr.119.18 cr is definitely a wrong figure.Thanks. — Precedingunsigned comment added by61.95.193.234 (talk) 11:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

DON 2 REACH SECOND WEEKEND BOX OFFICE WORLDWIDE

DON 2 has reached approximately 200 crore worldwide. Here's the info.---http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBb-vQ-8pcc&feature=endscreen&NR=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by125.24.101.0 (talk) 16:33, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit, Dawn.com Reference

Hi. I would like the editor to edit the reference from Dawn.com. I am the film critic who reviewed Don 2 for Dawn, and I did mention that it was a "slick thriller". I also said that "There’s a method to (Shah Rukh Khan's) madness that is only hampered by Farhan Akhtar’s overtly-relaxed prose". I gave the film a mediocre review. Not a good review. Please take note and edit accordingly. Thanks :)

The links for reference are here:

http://kamranjawaid.wordpress.com/2011/12/27/don-2-reviewed-by-kamran-jawaid/ (the unedited version at my blog)

and

http://www.dawn.com/2011/12/28/movie-review-don-2.html

MKJCritic (talk) 22:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 12 January 2012

why is the total collection not mentioned in the infobox? 123.252.215.175 (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Because the collection is still GOING ON! There is no TOTAL yet.-Animeshkulkarni (talk) 08:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done: request is unspecific. Mato (talk) 22:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Notice

To Meryam90 and the other user, please stop reverting constantly. Your actions are considered edit warring and will only lead you into trouble. Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 07:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

It's vandalism...adding false informations without a reliable source. What? I should keep it in the article? --Meryam90 (talk) 11:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Don 2 is Going to be released in Germany on 9-26th march,2012. So its total collection should be added up with its previous collection and should be updated in wikipedia immediately after it has done with it in Germany! — Precedingunsigned comment added by120.60.145.4 (talk) 12:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Don 2 is premiering in the Berlinale on February 11th, and will simultaneously release in Germany and 6 other countries. Updates from that will be added once released. Btw, is this bit of information there in the article? AnkitBhatt^WDF 13:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

POSTER

I don't know what is this new issue with posters we have, but enough is enough. No offense to anyone, but this whole matter is getting silly and immature with all the non-free images being uploaded. No more changes of poster anymore. Seems to me the Red poster is a favorite of editors around here and therefor it is best to be kept. Thank you.--Meryam90 (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

DON 2 BOX OFFICE WORLD WIDE

DON 2 box office is 230 crore worldwide. You can see from this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VqqxfDPuh0&list=UUBE65lv5PzK8O2nlvrbiYgQ&index=9&feature=plcp This video is about 2 mins.

P.S. THIS IS A RELIABLE SOURCE. — Precedingunsigned comment added by125.24.136.39 (talk) 13:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Avoid writing in capital letters; it means you are shouting, and nobody wants shouts here. The link will be duly checked, but unless a written article in a reliable source pops up, this video link may be a weak source for a tricky and sensitive thing as worldwide box office. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Maybe, but it still doesn't become an unreliable source just because its not accessible to a few people. X.One ^SOS 14:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

You failed to read the part "tricky and sensitive issue like worldwide gross". You and I both know that there are several editors who are going to pounce at the slightest increase in the collections of an SRK film. Hence, I made the statement. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I believe its a different issue when SRK fans indeed try to increase it, with reliable sources, as compared to when they pounce on it without a source barely to start a dispute or promote his projects. If there are only one or two figures showing up, all fine. But if not, we must continue doing what we have done in the past. So, there's nothing more to it to make it "tricky and sensitive". :) X.One ^SOS 14:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

You misunderstood my statement; I was referring to the SRK haters who do not want the proper worldwide all-language figures to be posted. They want the lowest reported figures to be posted, even if from an unreliable source (a similar case happened with Ra.One). This matter can become highly controversial, long and nasty and hence it is tricky to tackle properly. The biggest problem is that the article has now gone into full protection, so there' no way of editing it now. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 07:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 22 January 2012

205 crore clearly says expected --Ali 139.190.203.59 (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

??--Jac16888 ^Talk 13:19, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

NonFreeImageRemoved.svg

thumb Hello. I am recently trying to put File:Don2poster.jpg in the article but Meryam90 is removing it. We can put the picture naming it as a alternative poster for that? Why are you removing it? Yes, give the alternative picture a chance, too.Dipankan ^{In the woods?} 11:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Because this had happened before, 2 non free posters can not be in the same article. an other user tried and it got deleted anyway.--Meryam90 (talk) 15:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Protected

This article is suffering from a long-term war about the movie grosses. On 16 January it was placed under semiprotection, but that didn't solve the problem. After that a variety of registered accounts kept jumping in to change the numbers without getting consensus on the talk page. It is not practical to block everyone who keeps changing the numbers arbitrarily, so regrettably the article was put under full protection on 23 January.

It would be helpful if editors could agree here on the talk page as to what set of numbers is the correct one to use. Also, what images and reviews are appropriate for inclusion. You can use the{{editrequest}} template here on the Talk page to ask for changes while the article is protected. EdJohnston (talk) 14:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The Stardust Nominations are in, can someone add those? Here's the link to the nominations list and Don 2 is included:http://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/discussion/stardust-awards-2012-nominations — Preceding unsigned comment added byAshermadan (talk •contribs) 04:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Pinkvilla.com? What kind of a source is that? X.One ^SOS 12:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Haha, very funny. It's just a list of nominations provided by Stardust. You obviously aren't going to add it because of your bias. Forget it. — Precedingunsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk • contribs) 13:06, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

If you want something added to the protected article, write up the actual text that you want included first, and then use {{editrequest}}. Material will be added if either (a) it is uncontroversial, or (b) you can demonstrate that it has consensus. What exactly is pinkvilla.com and why should we consider their opinions important? EdJohnston (talk) 18:35, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Ashermadan, there is no need to jump and start calling everybody biased. Here, everyone is working for facts and not personal opinions. If Don 2 deserves something, it will be put in the article rightfully. Stay calm and wait, so that editors can discuss things over. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

It's just a list of nominations. A list. What's there to discuss about a list? It's a screenshot of a list! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk •contribs) 18:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Well that's fine, let's just use the same source used by User:secret of success on ZNMD's page then: http://www.magnamags.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=8923

Nominations for Stardust are:

• Best Actor - Thriller/Action - Shah Rukh Khan
• Best Actress - Thriller/Action Priyanka Chopra - Don 2
• Star Of The Year - Male - Shah Rukh Khan (Also For Ra.One)
• Star Of The Year - Female - Priyanka Chopra (Also Or Saat Khoon Maaf)
• Dream Director - Farhan Akhtar
• Film Of The Year

--Meryam90 (talk) 18:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Don 2 box office report

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGj6_2ux6Ak&list=UUBE65lv5PzK8O2nlvrbiYgQ&index=3&feature=plcp — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 125.24.139.110 (talk) 14:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm afraid videos like this will not be reliable sources. Besides, as is the case with many SRK films, the box office reports are controversial; some editors want to put up proper figures, while haters want to put up the lowest figures. The final gross will be given in time. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:51, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Accolades

This article needs update on the accolades section. The film won two filmfare awards for Best Action and Best Sound Design (which are not stated there) and it was nominated for Best Film, Best Director and Best Actor. - Torreslfchero(talk) 10:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done: This page is no longer protected. Subject to consensus, you should be able to edit it yourself. Anomie⚔ 20:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Missing songs?

I saw two songs on YTube, one of which is mentioned in the 'Casting and filming' section, "Mujhko Pehchan Lo". I think the other was "Dushman Mera". I then saw the film, and the songs were not there. Am I seeing an incomplete version of the film? Were these song just used to peek interest and not intended to be part of the film, or were they deleted later? If this is not normal, it should be mentioned in the article, as I was quite suprised to not see them. BollyJeff || talk 13:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

"Mujhko Pehchan Lo" a promotional song, it was filmed on SRK but not included in the film. "Dushman Mera" was the song of the end credits. some international versions didn't have it. U're not missing on anything from the movie :D--Meryam90 (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Okay then, is it normal to have promotional songs like that not included in the film? If not, please mention it in the article. BTW, there is some redundant language in that section too, but article is currently locked. BollyJeff|| talk 19:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes, for Bollywood, it is common to use promotional videos/songs, and I wish I could edit the article, there so many things to add and fix. ARG, some shit in life U just need to deal with. The article however will be unlocked by the 6 Feb...till then...--Meryam90 (talk) 19:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Meryam has answered your question: "Mujhko Pehchanlo" was a promotional song (pretty obvious seeing the song picturization :D), while "Dushman Mera" was a credits song. I think "Mujhko Pehchanlo" did come in the film, but that was after "Dushman Mera" in the credits part. You are not seeing any incomplete version/international version; heck, there's only one true-blue song-and-dance sequence ("Zaraa Dil Ko Thaam Lo") and if you remove that the film remains pretty much the same. But I don't think its normal in Bollywood films to have promotional songs; as far as I'm concerned, I haven't seen any "promotional song" for any film till date. We should ideally mention that. If this article is getting unlocked tomorrow, then there's a ton of work to be done. The article is really backward in terms of content and needs urgent updates. Btw BollyJeff, how did you like Don 2? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 06:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 4 February 2012

| Box office = ₹ 210* crore

Mathisha123 (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Added to the article. It's just the Hindi Only version so we'll update the infobox when we have the tamil,telugu,german,etc. figures also. It's expected that Don 2 is around 235 crores right now with all those included. As soon as we have a reference we'll update it. Thanks for pointing this out. Asher Madan 16:20, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 4 February 2012

Mombushkahn (talk) 19:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC) Don 2 has grossed 210 crores worldwide check it

That's the hindi version only. we added that. we are still waiting for the worldwide gross from the tamil,telugu,german,etc. versions. we will update it as soon as we know. Asher Madan 16:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)