Talk:Don Atchison
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Don Atchison article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editHey gang, just a note to explain my editing. As the seal on this page says, unsourced or poorly sourced material should be removed, and that's what I did toward the end of the article. I removed the following: "At a recent electoral debate, Atchinson's views on racial and sexual equality were raised. Over his three years as mayor, his controversial decision to fire city police chief Russell Sabo, who was widely perceived as 'Aboriginal-friendly'[citation needed], and instated himself as the police commissioner".
First of all, as a sentence, it simply doesn't make sense, particularly the sentence starting with "Over three years..." it starts a thought and never finishes it, and is sloppy writing. Also this "fact" is unsourced, and very much opinion. Until someone has verifiable documentation backing up these claims, they don't belong here.
Thanks, Aylwinatrix, Feb 4, 07
- Agreed. There has been a lot of ad hominem attacks surrounding Don Atchison lately (especially the poster during the last election). I think, for that reason, that this article should be treated with due scepticism. --bladebot 20:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
It's obvious that the last few edits, as well as ones in the past, have been written in a way to cast Atchison in a negative light. It's written as if he is personally responsible for the rising crime rate, burgeoning public debt and cost overruns at River Landing. This whole article needs a rewrite to be more balanced. --Drm310 (talk) 15:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
The article in its current form sounds like a propaganda piece for Don Atchison. I admit that some of the earlier versions of the article were unfairly negative about Atchison's time as mayor, but it has swung too far to the other side now. --Ishmael N. Daro 20:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishmaeldaro (talk • contribs)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Don Atchison. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121023102754/http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/story.html?id=bcdb8a12-e327-4484-905e-2c5e37ec8a46&k=58109 to http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/story.html?id=bcdb8a12-e327-4484-905e-2c5e37ec8a46&k=58109
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 12 September 2017 (UTC)