Talk:Don Harlow
Latest comment: 18 years ago by CKA3KA in topic Removed cleanup template
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removed cleanup template
editI removed the cleanup template after the following exchange with Admrb♉ltz:
- I'm curious to know why you tagged the Don Harlow stub for cleanup. I didn't create the article and have no vested interest in it, I'm just curious. I've been here a bit too long to call myself a newbie, but the amount of time I'm able to spend editing Wikipedia articles is limited, so I often feel like I'm new even though I'm not. It seems like a perfectly good stub to me, and there were no comments on the talk page to enlighten me (in fact, there is no talk page at all). As I said, my dander's not up or anything, I'm just curious. —CKA3KA (Skazka) 22:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- See the dif from when I added it -- it not realy encyclopedic, and had 2 images that were deleted shortly after I tagged it. Admrb♉ltz (T | C)
- Thanks. That clears things up for me nicely. The old version was indeed very much in need of cleanup. Does the cleanup template need to be removed, now? If so, I'll be happy to do it—or you can. Lemmeknow. —CKA3KA (Skazka) 22:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- I think it is safe to remove it, and you can go ahead and do it; I am at work :p Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 22:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. That clears things up for me nicely. The old version was indeed very much in need of cleanup. Does the cleanup template need to be removed, now? If so, I'll be happy to do it—or you can. Lemmeknow. —CKA3KA (Skazka) 22:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- See the dif from when I added it -- it not realy encyclopedic, and had 2 images that were deleted shortly after I tagged it. Admrb♉ltz (T | C)