Talk:Don Plusquellic

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Please Note

edit

Someone edited this article to be included in the categories "Drunks" and "Village Idiots." To the best of my knowledge these claims are ill found and thus not appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.5.109.34 (talk) 00:05, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

A great deal of the criticism section is based off of Akronwatch.org, which is slanted, and doesn't make for a very reliable source. I went ahead and cited them to the site (they had been uncited), but if anyone can find some newspaper sources that discuss these points, they should be used instead. 69.221.142.162 (talk) 05:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The issue with the Akron Beacon Journal as a source (I live in Akron) is that it is about as slanted as a newspaper can get. I truly believe Plusquellic's PR people (why the hell does a Mayor need a PR staff, anyway?) write it and there is no question that, if they don't actually write it, they oversee and edit it. 24.166.43.185 (talk) 17:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don Plusquellic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply