Talk:Don Vicente Rama Memorial National High School
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Adam9007 in topic Untitled
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Rusf10 (talk · contribs) on 21 May 2021. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Don Vicente Rama Memorial National High School article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Don Vicente Rama Memorial National High School is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThe following problems need to be resolved before it can measure up to any kind quality assurances:
- The article needs a lot of copyediting.
- The quotes are dull and consist of nothing but stereotypical school pep.
- The image syntax is really terrible and the choice of images is very unencyclopedic. Pictures of small student groups are not the least bit relevant to an encyclopedia. A few (about 4-6) pictures of exterior and interior is more than enough.
- The article is in effect unverifiable since this school "School Improvement Plan" doesn't seem to be something one can find at the local library.
- A lot of the article reads like a pamphlet and there is an excruciating amount of detail about the education of individual teachers, the merits of members of the student's union and other forms of trivia.
- There are too many lists and tables. If they can't easily be converted into prose, they should probably be removed altogether.
- There are several references to Kevin Ray, the article author himself, which may be a problem. Even if this reference is relevant, linking to one's own user page in article mainspace is not. See Wikipedia:Avoid self-references.
When improving the article, try to write with someone who has no initial interest or knowledge about the topic in mind. Currently, it reads more like a recruitment pamphlet than an encyclopedic article.
Peter Isotalo 09:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Adam9007 (talk) 20:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC) suspects that this article may be a copyright violation, but without a source this cannot be definitively determined. |