Talk:Dong Son culture
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Vietnam may be able to help! |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
East changed to South without comment
editSee this edit. Badagnani (talk) 20:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Edits that are not contributing to the article
editSee this edit. This constitutes to vandalism and does not support a NPOV.Sea888 (talk) 03:54, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Copyright violation
editRegarding the added content here: the second chapter ("This theory...") + begin of 3rd chapter ("Such interpretation...") seem to me as nearly identical as in: Keith Weller Taylor: The Birth of Vietnam. Revision of thesis (Ph.D.). Appendix D: The Archeological Record of Dong-Son, page 313. University of California Press (1991). ISBN 0520074173
I couldn't find the permission yet of the original author/publishing house - can someone point me there ? ----Erkan Yilmaz 17:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Resource on Dong Son bronze drums
editRecommending the following resource for this article, seeing as it seems to be lacking references: http://www.hawaii.edu/cseas/pubs/explore/han.html "The Present Echoes of the Ancient Bronze Drum: Nationalism and Archeology in Modern Vietnam and China" by Han Xiaorong. From Explorations in Southeast Asian Studies, a Journal of the Southeast Asian Studies Student Association, Vol 2, No. 2, Fall 1998. I'm not an expert on archaeology at all—that's why I'm not adding the reference myself—but this seems like a good, well-balanced article that could be used to expand this article (which seems far too short at the moment). --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 13:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 16:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
– WP:AT title consistency with Đông Sơn village, Thanh Hóa and Ngọc Lũ village Bình Lục District, WP:VN DISTRICT NAMES RFC, Category:Ancient Vietnam, Category:Archaeology of Vietnam, Category:Vietnamese musical instruments, and per English print sources with full fonts. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support. Although I'm ambivalent towards the use of diacritics in Wikipedia article titles there does appear to be consensus at Wikipedia:VN DISTRICT NAMES RFC. Zarcadia (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dong Son culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130426081801/http://www.littlevietnamtours.com.vn/about_vietnam/vietnam_culture/dong_son_culture.php to http://www.littlevietnamtours.com.vn/about_vietnam/vietnam_culture/dong_son_culture.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 12 September 2017 (UTC)