Talk:Donovan Warren/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Grondemar in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grondemar 04:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Working Will aim to complete the review in the next couple of days. Grondemar 04:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comment: I am not that familiar with American football so I will leave that part of the page alone. One glaring thing that I have noticed is the photo in the header and the caption beneath it. The caption should only serve to state whether the photo is a logo, mark, etc. It shouldn't be used to do any actual commentary of the photo. When dealing with articles about people, the photo itself should have a clear picture of the subject; the current photo doesn't even show his arms or legs, never mind his face.

That sort of pictures are good when you mix it up later on the article but as a header?...hmmm.....I don't know jack about American football...what good is a photo if it doesn't show what the subject at hand looks like? Jamen Somasu (talk) 20:33, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I made some copyedits to the article. In my mind, while this article is somewhat short, it does meet the good article criteria. I therefore will   pass it as a good article.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Thanks, and sorry for taking so long. Grondemar 16:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply