Talk:Doob martingale
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Doob martingale/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
---|---|
Geometry guy 21:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
This is a pretty bad article. The article on martingales is excellent, so it would be nice if the kind soul who did the martingale piece could fix this one. BTW the inequality should at least be called the Azuma-Hoeffding inequality since Hoeffding had it much earlier. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.244.69.62 (talk) 14:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC) It's not clear whether the martingale is a regular martingale or a martingale with respect to . More formally, is or is it ? I agree with Geometry guy that this is a pretty bad article. Also, a proof or a citation for this fact would be nice. sattath (talk) 12:56, 27 April 2011 (UTC) |
Last edited at 12:56, 27 April 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 19:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)