Contested deletion

edit

Subject is clearly notable. Reliable sources have been provided. Speedy deletion is wholly inappropriate. Benjamin (talk) 12:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

The nomination reason was "a very short article lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article," but there was sufficient context to identify it as a concept in economics, so I have declined the deletion nomination. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Doom loop into Economic collapse

edit

The term doom loop appears to be a neologism that has significant overlap with the concept covered in the Economic collapse article. As the article is also very short, I propose that the Doom loop article be merged into the Economic collapse article. — Newslinger talk 05:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

That article doesn't even mention it. I think some other Wikipedia articles do, if I recall, however, so perhaps those should be considered. Benjamin (talk) 05:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
I've check what currently links to Doom loop, and it is only linked (in article space) from Economic collapse to Bailout. Of these, the synonym is clearly Economic collapse, so I support the proposal to merge there. I also note that Benjaminikuta (Bemjamin) created the page in May 2019 and it doesn't seem to have developed since then. Klbrain (talk) 19:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

12 months since it was first proposed that it be merged with Economic Collapse, this entry has remained just a single line definition, more fitting for a dictionary than an encyclopedia. This suggests that it should be merged.Ian Radbone (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 10:00, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply