This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hutton is hardly a reliable source since he often reads into or misrepresents his sources as revealed by Ben Whitmore in "Trials of the Moon." I have read Doreen's autobiography, and she does not undermine Wicca as a survival. Why cite an untrustworthy historian such as Hutton when one can cite and even quote from the direct source itself: The Rebirth of Witchcraft, by Doreen Valiente?! Contrary to Hutton's position, if I may digress, he admits in his book, "Witches, Druids and King Arthur" that as he was writing "Triumph of the Moon" he was both unable to prove the modernity of Wicca, and that he had discovered and intentionally ignored evidence tethering Wicca to pre-Christian paganism because it would have disproved the argument he was overly concerned with; therefore, "Triumph of the Moon" is an exercise in Confirmation Bias! Something else Wiccans don't like to confront is, when Hutton's arguments are taken to their logical conclusions, Wicca is nothing more than a direct off-shoot of Christianity. Hutton insists that all scholars who describe a goddess as a "Mother Goddess" are projecting the Virgin Mary onto their source data; there are no Dying-and-Rising gods other than Christ; the Horned God is nothing but a reimagining of Jesus; and that his thesis has always been that Wicca extracted the pagan elements of of Christianity, which Hutton refuses to acknowledge as being of an authentic provenance. Therefore, what other conclusion can one reach after reading "Triumph of the Moon"! But, the trouble is that Hutton never openly disclosed his thesis in "Triumph of the Moon," he only explained it in an article, which few Pagans have ever read. 70.39.20.64 (talk) 05:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hutton is one of the most respected scholars on the topic of witchcraft. Ben Whitmore is not a scholarly source and while that does not render his criticisms of Hutton necessarily invalid, I think it does make them unreliable for the purposes of Wikipedia.
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.jpg){kind=small}
