Talk:Dorothy Dunn

Untitled

There's a nice photo on p.39 of "Through Their Eyes", the catalog of the current exhibition at the Wheelwright Museum. If someone will scan it, I'll do the paperwork for fair use in our article. Nice show, btw. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 04:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Edit war

Why is this [1], which replaces a link to the original site to a link to a copyvio, an improvement? William M. Connolley (talk) 18:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

It's not, and I see that both are removed, which seems to be an equitable solution. Cheers, -Uyvsdi (talk) 19:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi

Equitable solution? The info is not important? This user's objectivity flutters like a hummingbird and if the truth be known is dependent upon our editing disputes in other articles. Amerindianarts (talk) 19:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I think anyone reading this article who craves more information is capable of using Google to find the other 10K+ articles about Dorothy Dunn. -Uyvsdi (talk) 20:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi

I am unable to understand U's position. You have edit warred repeatedly to a version that you now assert is not an improvement, which seems entirely pointless and indeed a net negative. Meanwhile A has for reasons I don't understand removed the link in question [2] William M. Connolley (talk) 20:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I removed it because I had restored it and don't want the accusations of a conflict of interests now or in the future. I don't want to argue about it and I don't want a link to a copyvio. The "equitable solution" is for U to restore it to its original version and end the argument.Amerindianarts (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I would like to add that the santafesite will be removing the article from their website.Amerindianarts (talk) 00:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah. I was wondering how they got to put it up, since they don't look like pirates William M. Connolley (talk) 07:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

The website is operated by another web design company. They were very understanding and I don't think they are pirates. The problem is copyright violations by ezinearticles and their mirror sites. We had virtual fisticuffs a couple of years ago over copyright violations. This is an example of what happens to sites who don't comply with copyrights. http://www.cause-celebre.com/dorothy-dunn-and--primitive--art.html

Well Uyvsdi, it appears that thus far the consensus is against your removal of the link. Are you going to do the equitable thing and make another one of your "substantial contributions" by restoring your edit, or are you going to sit on your hands and continue to be contrary?Amerindianarts (talk) 02:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

• When reading this article in the past, I found a couple of links for users to go to if they wanted to check up Wikipedia's article or find more information. I think the links were useful, but I never realized anyone would want to make a tempest in a teapot out of them. I find it useful for our articles to link to other websites, thus avoiding the need to break off some research to conduct a websearch. Stepp-Wulf (talk) 00:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Dunn in California

I came here to read more about Dunn in California, currently there is not much about that here. Adding a note here incase anyone wants to further develop about her later life. Joojay (talk) 22:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)