This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
2016 Revision
edit@Jonkerz:, thought I'd ping you for this one. Major taxonomic changes have occurred; 28 genera (27 extant and 1 extinct) are now recognized, an increase from 20 in the previous classification scheme. Two new genera are proposed, 8 are removed from synonymy and 7 are placed in synonymy. Source is found here. Burklemore1 (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oh noooo not again! :) thanks for the ping btw, Burklemore1. I haven't kept up with the latest taxonomy, but this is something we must fix. I'll add it to the todo. jonkerz ♠talk 05:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- No worries, the subfamilies seem to be having a major revamp or something. I have updated the genera list in accordance to the changes though. :) Burklemore1 (talk) 05:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I've updated the main article[1]. Not done yet:
- Amyrmex synonym of Leptanilloides [2]
- Asphinctanilloides synonym of Leptanilloides [3]
- More...