Talk:Double Fold

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

I'd recommend the following link: http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/jun01/voice.htm and possibly a mention of this review of Double Foldin the article. It is one of the best reviews of the book I've read and does a better job of driving home the point that libraries are to be used. 74.130.104.62 18:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Bruce SandersReply


It will take me some time to document this, so I'm hoping a fellow information scientist will have quick access to the sources and step in here. The American Newspaper Repository's agreement with Duke only came after Baker realized how expensive it was to store those volumes (undermining his assertion that microfilming was the more expensive option). It is known (through quotes in articles) that he contacted several university libraries to unload American Newspaper Repository's collection. These facts seem to be important enough for inclusion in either the "Reactions" section or more appropriately the "Conclusions" section. I'll post the documentation of this here first before editing the article. Librarian1968 (talk) 07:56, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Double Fold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply