 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Transcon range
editA flat statement that DC-6s and DC-6Bs did not have the range to fly transcon is clearly unwarranted. We can all agree they could have made the trip; they couldn't have flown westbound in under 8 hours, and we don't know just what payload they could have handled westbound if the eight-hour rule hadn't been a problem.
(No reason to imagine the airlines were flying uneconomic payloads from California to Hawaii; remember PA, Northwest, Canadian Pacific, and Philippine flew DC-4s to Hawaii-- Matson too, I guess. But as I recall Calif-Hawaii is a bit shorter than NY-LA.)
The DC-7 didn't carry more fuel than the DC-6B (or the DC-6, I suspect). Wright claimed the Turbo-Compound was more efficient, which it would need to be just to get the same range, with a heavier aircraft flying faster. Brooks says in the cruise the DC-7 burned maybe 10% less fuel per mile than the DC-6B.
FWIW: a DC-6B flew nonstop LA to Paris in 1953 (delivery flight to TAI). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim Zukas (talk • contribs) 00:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- The main problem is that these statements are unclear and/or unsourced. Reliable sources need to be provided to back up any claims (and I don't mean airline timetables, which prove nothing), or vague mentions of "Brooks". Btw, it was claimed that the CA-HI route was longer than the CA-NY routes, which is the context of operating with reduced payload - obviously some point was in error. And I'm pretty certain the LA-Paris filght wasn't with a full load either. - BilCat (talk) 00:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- It for sure wasn't. Exactly what the article should say is up for discussion; all we know for sure is it shouldn't say "The DC-6B didn't have the range to fly transcon", since it will be quite impossible to find any reliable sources to back that claim. Tim Zukas (talk) 21:23, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- (I remembered wrong; it turns out HNL-LAX is 80 miles farther than LAX-IDL.) Tim Zukas (talk) 22:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- (For the record, the TAI DC-6B did fly LA-Paris with more than the usual tankage; American Aviation says it started with 6760 gallons, with 840 left on arrival.) Tim Zukas (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)