Talk:Douglas Engelbart/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ankit Maity in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ankit Maity (talk · contribs) 06:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
The review is thus on hold. --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 07:47, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for reviewing the article. :) I'll see what I can do... Disavian (talk) 02:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Complete the task. Then, passed. --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 09:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 12:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply