This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Should the article include what Dowisetrepla is an abbreviation for? I've been deleting it every time someone adds it back because it ruins the final punch line of the episode, but some people clearly think it belongs in the article because they keep adding it back. So, are we completely accurate at the expense of a joke, or do we leave something for readers to learn from watching the episode? Sailor Psychic (talk) 04:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Many other episode summaries, not exclusive to HIMYM, reveal the big secret from the episode. I don't think revealing it here ruins a joke, part of it is the set up throughout the entire episode. This summary is so anemic, there is almost none - except for their ignorance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.223.19.3 (talk) 18:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
I don't think so. They wouldn't want to give that away early. Plus, in No Tomorrow, the floor only appears slanted to us when Marshall realizes it. We don't realize it because they don't realize it yet.
Hbomberman (talk) 02:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Robin doesn't claim Mt. Waddington to be the tallest mountain, she just says that it is "like" the tallest mountain. Most of the extremely tall mountains are up in the Yukon and aren't exactly fit for ski resorts. Not really an error, because of the word "like." For example, "Oh, it's like, the best restaurant in the city!" "You're WRONG! A look at critical reviews and surveys taken over the last twenty years will reveal that..." See my point, it was a generalized statement, not a fact. Remove.
You're wrong, she didn't say that it is "like" the tallest moutain, she just say that it is the tallest mountain in Canada, then she says that it's "like" 4,000 meters high.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.216.16.191 (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
