Talk:Down and Dirty Duck/Archive 1

Archive 1

Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of May 8, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Satisfactory Contains shortened word such as ad these should be written correctly.

2. Factually accurate?: Fail Several areas are missing references such as the quote: "Dirt Duck received mostly negative reviews" and others, especially in the plot section.

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass Could be border but its satisfactory

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass No non-neutral text in it

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Pass A small selection of images, all with fair use rationales.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. — The Sunshine Man 11:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think there is a requirement that statements in the intro need to have inline citations, and the critic's section reveals the mostly negative reviews. For the plot, probably only the "Dirty Duck is notable for its use of in-jokes." statement needs to have an inline citation. --Nehrams2020 18:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• I have addressed the issues that have been brought up. Please take a look at the current revision and re-review its GA status. (Ibaranoff24 21:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC))

Bobby London

Was this movie based on Bobby London's comic or not. It doesn't look much like that, according to the movie poster...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.232.72.148 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 29 November 2005.

No, it was not. I added some information about the connections between the comic strip and the film (or lack of). (Sugar Bear 19:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC))

Bobby London

Was this movie based on Bobby London's comic or not. It doesn't look much like that, according to the movie poster...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.232.72.148 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 29 November 2005.

No, it was not. I added some information about the connections between the comic strip and the film (or lack of). (Sugar Bear 19:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC))

Discussion pertaining to non-free image(s) used in article

A cleanup page has been created for WP:FILMS' spotlight articles. One element that is being checked in ensuring the quality of the articles is the non-free images. Currently, one or more non-free images being used in this article are under discussion to determine if they should be removed from the article for not complying with non-free and fair use requirements. Please comment at the corresponding section within the image cleanup listing. Before contributing the discussion, please first read WP:FILMNFI concerning non-free images. Ideally the discussions pertaining to the spotlight articles will be concluded by the end of June, so please comment soon to ensure there is clear consensus. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Bobby London's Dirty Duck

Bobby London accused the filmmakers of stealing the title of his comic, not of plagiarizing the comic; also, source is a Frank Zappa fan site -- not reliable. --74.42.44.222 (talk) 21:11, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Down and Dirty Duck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090406210842/http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/trailers-from-hell-dirty-duck.html to http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/trailers-from-hell-dirty-duck.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)