Wikipedia

Talk:Downtown Cleveland

Latest comment: 3 years ago by LakeCityCle in topic Superior Arts District?
Learn more about this page

Untitled

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed some anti-Shoreway bias from the subsection "Lakefront". First off, the Shoreway is not a "high speed expressway" by any stretch of the imagination. Its speed limit is 50 mi/hr. Other freeways in Cleveland are 60 mi/hr with a few being 55 mi/hr.

The former text said "pedestrians must cross today over bridges in 1 or 2 places". There are more than 2 bridges crossing the shoreway to the lakefront that pedestrians may use. In any event, language like "1 or 2" is not acceptable in an encyclopedia.

The Shoreway is not the largest impediment to lakefront development either. The Port and cleanup of polluted land are a few that do come to mind.

Joshua 17:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

EXCELLENT!

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Good job to whoever put together the 'future plans' section on this article. It is phenomenal and covers all the core projects. I assume you're an Urbanohio member (as I am too!) Good luck with future additions to this article!

yeah. Now it just needs sources--Sefringle 03:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rename to "Downtown Cleveland future plans"

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article talks a lot about future plans for downtown Cleveland--moreso than it talks about what downtown actually is today. Plans from the mayor's office should be in an article entitled as such. I'm proposing renaming thsi article to "Downtown Cleveland future plans". Joshua 17:11, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I moved the page back, and cleaned up the Lakefront plan section. The article covers downtown history, current contitions, and plans for the future. If you feel it's lacking in some areas, feel free to expand it. - EurekaLott 19:17, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply


Pictures

edit

Thanks to the uploader of the current pic of downtown, that's been bothering me for a while that we haven't had a current picture to balance the 1909 pic.

Theater District

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed this from the recently renamed Theater District section:

"ideastream shares the space with Playhouse Square's Arts Education Departmentin a partnership that unlike any in the U.S."

The "space" is One Playhouse Square. I don't think this information is very notable, and it kind of reads like an advertisement. If anyone thinks it merits inclusion in the article, put it back in, but please provide some more context. Confiteordeo 22:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Euclidrender.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Euclidrender.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:08, 29 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Flats united plan.png

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Flats united plan.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:EastBankProject.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:EastBankProject.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Definition of Downtown

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Are the population figures given for 2000 and 2010 for the exact same area? I ask, because I can come up with the 2010 population figure adding four Census tracts that just visibly correspond with downtown. Does the 2000 population figure include the Census tract on the west side of the river (Tract 1033), or was that absent for from the 2000 definition of downtown? There needs to be a description of what counts as downtown proper in the opening paragraph. --Criticalthinker (talk) 08:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 23 external links on Downtown Cleveland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:22, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Downtown Cleveland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Land area

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can someone add to the infobox and "history and redevelopment" section the square mileage of this area? It looks like a Census Tract, and if that is the case it should be fairly easy for someone who knows the area to find this important piece of information. --Criticalthinker (talk) 18:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Superior Arts District?

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article does a fantastic job on the various districts of Downtown, including historical ones like Short Vincent. However, I'm surprised that there is no mention of the Superior Arts District. It should be added.

Done. Section added. LakeCityCle (talk) 21:22, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Downtown_Cleveland&oldid=1205924387"