Talk:Dr. Praeger's

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

References

edit

The references used for this article are somewhat sketchy.

  • The WeightWatchers reference is basically a blog post (although, admittedly posted by the site editors).
  • The Food & Drink entry is probably the dodgiest: this publication appears to exist solely for the purpose of promoting the various businesses it highlights. This purpose is made more clear by the presence of a testimonials page wherein companies that have been highlighted express their thanks for the good job and the good publicity.
  • The reference to Dr. Praeger's own FAQ is obviously problematic.

Better sources are needed. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dr. Praeger's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply