Talk:Drache-class ironclad

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga in topic GA Review
Good articleDrache-class ironclad has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starDrache-class ironclad is part of the Ironclads of Austria-Hungary series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 3, 2016Good article nomineeListed
December 22, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Drache-class ironclad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Section 1; sentence 1; "...launch of the French Gloire, the first ironclad warship", first ironclad of the world or Europe or France, mention that clearly.
    • Done
  • Section 1; Better mention who is "Kaiser Franz Josef I", something like "Emperor of Austria" etc.
    • Added
  • Section 1.1; para 1; beam measured 13.94 meters (45 ft 9 in); but in the infobox it is 14 m (45 ft 11 in)
    • A legacy of when the article was based on Silverstone's less precise work - good catch.
  • Section 1.1; para 1; they displaced 2,824 long tons (2,869 t) at normal load, and 3,110 long tons (3,160 t) at deep load; but in the infobox it is 2,779 long tons (2,824 t)
    • Probably the same as above
  • Is it possible to add the information about the later guns that were installed in 1867, in the infobox.
    • Added
  • Section 1.14; para 3; The frigates broadside ironclads; this looks a bit confusing. I think it is to "The frigates were broadside ironclads".
    • Yeah, the "were" was missing.
  • All the three images lack dates on their description pages. Please add approx. dates as I suggested on Talk:Kaiser Max-class ironclad (1862)/GA1.
    • Added to all three
  • Better to link "Prussia" and "Italy" on their first mention.
    • Linked Prussia, but Italy is already linked in the design section.
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:30, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply