Talk:Dracophyllum arboreum/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Dracophyllum in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Okay I'll bite XD....making copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and jotting queries below... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- We don't italicise family names
- ...sea level to 270 m (885.83 ft) - need to round this
- ...some 800 km (497.10 mi) - and this
- link subgenus, plant community, sessile, endemic
- add imperial conversions for wind speeds
- Caprosma??
- I added "species in the genus Comprosma" Dracophyllum 07:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- why is it spelt Caprosma and not coprosma though Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Because I can't spell :), fixed now Dracophyllum 22:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- why is it spelt Caprosma and not coprosma though Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Do we know anything else about likely pollinators etc.?
- Don't think so, will have a deeper search though... Dracophyllum 07:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- fingers crossed.....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- link variety
- At first mention, describe who/what Cockayne is. Also Cheeseman, Mueller and Venter
- link Canary Islands
- You've mentioned and linked Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand twice - one abbreviated and one italicised....
- link clade at first mention in text...
Use consistent date formatting in referencesI meant like this for future reference Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: am presuming nothing is turning up on pollinator search. Not a deal-breaker for GA-hood. nice work.Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:34, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review cas :) Dracophyllum 00:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)