Talk:Dragon Quest VI

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleDragon Quest VI has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 27, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
August 5, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 22, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Requested move 9 July 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. -- Tavix (talk) 21:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


Dragon Quest VI: Realms of RevelationDragon Quest VI – On the Nintendo DS game, the subtitles are different. 2A02:C7D:564B:D300:3C1A:53BD:793E:CDDC (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please note that the nonimator is blocked for block evasion and a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 115#Dragon Quest subtitles in the page name had a consensus to use subtitles.--174.91.187.80 (talk) 03:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support move. (1) There was no such "consensus" at that link, 174.91. (2) There's a particular case for dropping the subtitle here because there's no indication that it's known better by one subtitle than the other, or really that either full subtitled name is better known than just "Dragon Quest VI" alone. We need more sources if we are to claim that the subtitle is vital (per the naming criteria in the article titles policy) to be the most recognizable (the name most people will call it), natural (reflecting what it's usually called), precise (unambiguously identified), and concise (not longer than necessary to identify) name. "Dragon Quest VI" is the most sufficient by those criteria. We would need a whole lot more sources that use the subtitle without the Roman numeral to prove that it is known as well in those conditions as without, if we want to warrant the longer title vis-à-vis the naming criteria. czar 01:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dragon Quest VI. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dragon Quest VI. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply