Talk:Dreamgirls

Untitled

wow! beyonce as effie?

Apparently, she is now to play Deena, which is maybe just a little bit TOO ironic. --FuriousFreddy 00:52, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Happy Ending?

Perhaps the plot summary was taken from the broadway booklet, or some other official form, but I think it is really too simplistic to claim that "the story ends with a happy ending for all." I think it's fairly obvious that there is a bitter-sweet ending, in truth, probably leaning much more towards the 'bitter' end of the spectrum. 65.92.63.76 03:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Contains error: Second sentence, reference to the Shirelles: This was not a Motown group. It was from the Philadelphia area and recorded on an independewnt label based in Philadelphia that was -- in a rarity for the time -- headed by a woman. The Shirelles started scoring hit records around 1959 or so -- ahead of the rise of Motown and its female singing groups. None of this is to say that the Shirelles were or were not part of the inspiration for "Dreamgirls." It was a three-member group of African-American women. Rogerbryant 02:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

S. Epatha Merkerson

S. Epatha Merkerson of TVs "Law and Order" said she participated in a workshop of Dreamgirls when it was still referred to as Project #9 on an episode of The View. She went into greater detail about the character she helped develope and the changes that were eventually made to the show. (Her character was dropped.) I tried to find more information about this online, because I don't remember all the details. Once more complete info is found, I think this bit of trivia is worth including under the History section.

The famous Amateur Night talent competition at the Apollo Theatre in Chicago?

Shouldn't the section in ACT I read "the famous Amateur Night talent competition at the Apollo Theatre in Harlem NY"? The Apollo Theater in Harlem NY is the home of the world famous Amateur Night for over the past 80 some-odd years.

Will fix. --FuriousFreddy 01:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move – This is not a vote guys; most of you haven't given any reasons and/or evidence why the move should be carried out. There's no way to determine consensus here. The only reason given is not really valid I'm afraid, since "first to be produced" doesn't necessarily mean it's the primary topic. If there is evidence that there is a primary topic, you can make a new move request. ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 10:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

---

Dreamgirls (musical) → Dreamgirls — The article was controversially moved to the current location recently without discussion or consensus. The musical is the primary topic and a dab page for two articles is not necessary. Aspects (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

• Agreed. Mark E (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
• Agreed. -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
• Agreed. The musical was the first to be produced, and should be considered primary.JeanColumbia (talk) 11:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose unless primary topic status can be established. Original vs. derivative and/or original title do not suffice. — AjaxSmack 21:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
• oppose--Levineps (talk) 05:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

Still no arguments for a move. Highly popular multiple award-winning musical vs. highly popular multiple award-winning movie = no primary topic. The original title dates from before the movie's release so precedent arguments are weak. Derivative arguments also do not, by themselves, establish primacy. Please comment if I'm missing something. — AjaxSmack 19:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dreamgirls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cd.columbus.oh.us/features-story.php?story=dispatch/2006/12/25/20061225-B1-02.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117467097.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091120195310/http://www.playbill.com:80/news/article/134661-Not-Going-So-Fast-Dreamgirls-Extends-by-a-Week-at-NYCs-Apollo to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/134661-Not-Going-So-Fast-Dreamgirls-Extends-by-a-Week-at-NYCs-Apollo
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090301030949/http://www.playbill.com:80/news/article/97516.html to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/97516.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110211025852/http://tuts.com/Images/SeasonShowDocs/dreamgirls_study.pdf to http://www.tuts.com/Images/SeasonShowDocs/dreamgirls_study.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Interesting casting choices

The last column of the 'Casts of notable productions' section (titled '2017 UK tour') is nonsense. None of those actors have ever been in any production of Dreamgirls.

82.28.236.173 (talk) 20:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

It has been removed. Thanks! BOVINEBOY2008 16:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)