Talk:Drepanaspis gemuendenensis

	Paleontology portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This redirect is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can we undo this latest move? There is only one species, D. gemuendenensis.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 19 May 2015

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved withdrawn Mike Cline (talk) 17:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Drepanaspis gemuendenensis → Drepanaspis – It turns out that there is more than one species in this genus. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 08:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Mr Fink (talk) 22:13, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Comment wouldn't that be a split proposal? -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 05:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're right. I withdraw this request then, and thank you for reminding me of the genus page.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:35, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic