This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
1. This article doesn't seem to have 1,000 words. I would make this the number one issue when approaching to edit your page. The lead paragraph seems good, but might be able to split into two since there is so much info provided. Lead sections are used to draw viewers in, not scare with too much. We are missing 4 total sections, though, and the amount of citations. We could use some images, too.
2. Sources seem like they're pretty official and sufficient for Wiki. References are not recorded correctly, but that's an easy fix. This is very necessary though to make wikipedia a credible source, which is our reason to be in this class. I feel these authors used worth while articles to retrieve their info from.
3. Info is factual, not bias, but could use some work on flow. Make it easier for viewers to follow. Overall, some content is missing, but some format fixing and a little more info will make this page solid!
500 words per person: No
Lead Paragraph: Yes
4 Sections of content: No
Minimum ammount of citations:5
Images: None
Evaluation of Resources:
Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority? Yes
Are the sources listed in the References of accurate? Yes
Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles? Yes
Readability & Content:
Is the information being presented factual in nature? Yes
Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias) Yes
Does the article flow effectively? Yes
Does the article feeling like it is missing content? No
In general its nice, but if you can get a picture and section it out, you should be fine.
