Talk:Drinking water quality standards

Latest comment: 1 year ago by EMsmile in topic Some work required on the lead

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Miegodorales, ThomasDunker.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Are these official standards?

edit

International standards generally have a reference number, issued by some international body such as ISO. --RichardVeryard (talk) 04:21, 17 April 2010 (UTC) hardness of water <200ppm pH 6.5-8.5 alkalinity as low as posible — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.85.83 (talk) 10:26, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Context and accuracy

edit

I am no expert but this page looks far from complete. There is no mention of the levels 100s of pollutants that are found in drinking water. The four inorganic chemical mentioned is but a small subset of the total. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:40, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree; It has now been totally re-written from agreed international sources (WHO, European Drinking Water Directive and EPA)  Velella  Velella Talk   21:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drinking water quality standards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

P.R.China's standard is GB 5749-2006 (Standards for drinking water quality) http://www.gb688.cn/bzgk/gb/newGbInfo?hcno=73D81F4F3615DDB2C5B1DD6BFC9DEC86 ,not"Environmental quality standards for surface water". Chinese language is edited https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%A3%B2%E7%94%A8%E6%B0%B4%E6%B0%B4%E8%B3%AA%E6%A8%99%E6%BA%96 .My English level is not enough to edit this page.Need your help. 美柳 (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Added Expand language|langcode=zh tag 美柳 (talk) 10:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

empty fields in the table

edit

What do the empty fields in the table indicate? Stjohn1970 (talk) 16:14, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

This table has multiple errors. How many errors overall, I don't know, but the "US" column has missing or outdated entries. I do not recommend that you rely on this table for anything important; always check the official regulations or documents.
If the table was regularly & responsibly maintained (which is a difficult ask on Wikipedia, mostly relying on volunteer editors), all of the fields would either display some value, "NS" or the " symbol, as explained in the legend just above the table. But there are some completely blank fields, for which there is no explanation; and some of the numeric values displayed are incorrect. Moreau1 (talk) 16:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Some work required on the lead

edit

If someone has time, please do a bit of work on the lead: It should be a better summary of the article. Also, it contains information that is not included elsewhere in the article, see the tag added in May this year (this content should be added to the main text as well). EMsmile (talk) 12:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply