Talk:Drive (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 00:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Will review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 00:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   –

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• Lead: I think production info should stay together (i.e. rearrange it so that the casting info with the writing, directing credits).
• Brian Craston is wikilinked twice in lead
• "...investigating possible, and erroneous, domestic terrorism." How is the domestic terrorism erroneous? I assume you mean that there ultimately was no terrorism?
• No need to wikilink United States, United Kingdom, and Ireland (common words)
• "The episode received 0.70 million viewers..." An episode does not "receive" viewers ;)
• "The episode later won an American Society of Cinematographers award for best regular series" -> "Drive" won the award for Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography – Regular Series from the American Society of Cinematographers.
• Quotation mark problems persist (" versus ')
• Use consistent ref formatting (5 vs 7 for example)
• Ref 7 publisher should be New York (also provide wikilink)
• Unitalicize Critical Myth

I believe that's it. I'll place the review on hold for seven days (though it'd be cool if you get it done by the 28th, (b/c of the Wikicup). Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 01:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

OK, I believe I've fixed all the issues. Thank you for reviewing!--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

• Looks good. Pass for GA. Ruby 2010/2013 04:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)