Talk:Drs. Foster & Smith

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

article name

edit

Hey, I notice the article starts off with bolded Foster & Smith, Inc. while the article is named Drs. Foster & Smith. I think the article needs to be moved to Foster & Smith Inc, or the lede needs to be revised to show Drs. Foster & Smith first. Perhaps lead with something like "Drs. Foster & Smith, also known as Foster & Smith, Inc., is a pet supply company....". Anyhow, having both put in bold in the lede without explaining their relationship is a problem. Are they the same or not? Say so, up front. Also i raised article rating to Start as this is clearly Start or above in level. I am not an expert about assessing articles so someone else should rate it higher if appropriate. --doncram (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have clarified the relationship. It is fairly standard to have an article located at its common name, but start the article with its legal name. (This is true for businesses and people.) However, since the relationship isn't 100% clear in this case it's a worthwhile adjustment to make. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:46, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Okay, fine by me. Thanks! --doncram (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drs. Foster & Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply