Talk:Drug Testing (The Office)
Drug Testing (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Drug Testing (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editThis review is transcluded from Talk:Drug Testing (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the lead, it would be best to add where the episode was broadcast. I think expanding the lead a bit won't hurt, just like previous Office GA's.
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- In the lead, it would be best to add where the episode was broadcast. I think expanding the lead a bit won't hurt, just like previous Office GA's.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- It wouldn't hurt to link "Dunder Muffin". In the Reception section, "The Office", "Rolling Stone" and "Seattle Times" need to be italicized, per here.
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- It wouldn't hurt to link "Dunder Muffin". In the Reception section, "The Office", "Rolling Stone" and "Seattle Times" need to be italicized, per here.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the above statement can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you to Red Thunder for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Drug Testing (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/Celebrity-Blogs/Jennas-Blog/Office-Undergoes-Drug/800000941
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:37, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Drug Testing (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://community.tvguide.com/thread.jspa?threadID=800001569
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121113211748/http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-2/58601/1/16/newest/ to http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-2/58601/1/16/newest/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927194734/http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/officeseason2.php to http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/officeseason2.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Drug Testing (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/the-office/drug-testing.php?page=1 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111118015309/http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-1/58498/pilot/episode-100/58499 to http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-1/58498/pilot/episode-100/58499/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Drug Testing (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090212125411/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/entertainment/2002970382_theoffice04.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/entertainment/2002970382_theoffice04.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)