Talk:Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Vif12vf in topic English name


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

English name

edit

Why aren't using the translated name? It's sourced, and not translating the title of a party is on a case by case exception on wiki:eng. --Aréat (talk) 16:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

I think not translating a party's name should only be acceptable for countries where english is often mixed with local languages. Such however is not the case with Bhutan and thus i think the party name should be translated. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
I think this discussion should also be about the names of the Bhutan Kuen-Nyam Party and Druk Chirwang Tshogpa. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
With these two, however, we don't have a source with an english translation of the name. If we had one, I would agree that they should be renamed as well.--Aréat (talk) 23:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Should we rename this article then? I mean, there have been no objections after all! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 10:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)Reply