Talk:Druzhba pipeline

Question about mentioning a LNG plant in the text

What has oil pipeline to do with LNG plant???Beagel 18:45, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

reversal?

The image and caption talk about a "proposed reversal", but this isn't mentioned in the article. The article does mention some proposed extensions, but to my mind "reversal" ought to mean something different? --Delirium 01:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually "proposed reversal" means Druzhba Adria pipeline. And its mentioned in the article that this includes reverse the flow of the Adria pipeline. But I think that maybe Druzhba Adria needs separate article?Beagel 20:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

The Lithuanian connection

Our article on the Būtingė oil terminal states that, up till 2006, Butinge was also connected to this here Druzhba pipeline, and has a reference for it , however I see no mention of this in the present article. Perhaps it is not so clearly defined which Russian pipelines are part of Druzhba and which are not? Jan olieslagers (talk) 09:38, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

It is mentioned in the 'Route' section: The ORLEN Lietuva in Lithuania and Ventspils oil terminal in Latvia are connected to the main pipeline by the branch pipeline from Unecha junction in Bryansk Oblast (not shown on the map). This branch has ceased operation in 2006 and is not likely to become operational in any time soon. Beagel (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Druzhba pipeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080601021728/http://www.jamestown.org:80/edm/article.php?article_id=2372185 to http://www.jamestown.org/edm/article.php?article_id=2372185

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Beagel (talk) 12:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Druzhba pipeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.osa.ceu.hu/files/holdings/300/8/3/text/122-1-92.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100101074415/http://www.france24.com:80/en/20091228-russia-warns-oil-supply-cut-off-through-ukraine-says-slovakia-petrol-europe to http://www.france24.com/en/20091228-russia-warns-oil-supply-cut-off-through-ukraine-says-slovakia-petrol-europe
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100123093311/http://www.france24.com:80/en/20091229-russia-ukraine-agreement-oil-transit-naftogaz-raise-tariffs-30-percent to http://www.france24.com/en/20091229-russia-ukraine-agreement-oil-transit-naftogaz-raise-tariffs-30-percent
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160213123426/http://www.jamestown.org/programs/edm/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=32762&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=171&no_cache=1 to http://www.jamestown.org/programs/edm/single/?tx_ttnews
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071016151733/http://www.neurope.eu/articles/74317.php to http://www.neurope.eu/articles/74317.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090619075747/http://www.euractiv.com/en/energy/russia-builds-baltic-oil-pipeline-bypass-belarus/article-183101?Ref=RSS to http://www.euractiv.com/en/energy/russia-builds-baltic-oil-pipeline-bypass-belarus/article-183101?Ref=RSS

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Druzhba pipeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.france24.com/en/20091228-russia-warns-oil-supply-cut-off-through-ukraine-says-slovakia-petrol-europe
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.france24.com/en/20091229-russia-ukraine-agreement-oil-transit-naftogaz-raise-tariffs-30-percent
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927202545/http://www.transneft.ru/Projects/Default.asp?LANG=EN&ID=231 to http://www.transneft.ru/Projects/Default.asp?LANG=EN&ID=231

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Druzhba pipeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207190632/http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3457 to https://foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3457

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 12 June 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 17:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

---

Druzhba pipeline → Druzhba – Primary topic as evidenced by reliable sources. (previous discussion) wumbolo ^^^ 21:00, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

• Oppose. Druzhba 'friendship' is a rather common Russian and Ukrainian word, used for numerous purposes, as evidenced in the dab page. Even taking the "primary topic" claim at face value (and I highly doubt it), the full, WP:RECOGNIZABLE name of the pipeline is "Druzhba pipeline". As Ymblanter said in that discussion, Google search shows a broad variety of uses on the first few pages, flatly disproving the PTOPIC claim. No such user (talk) 14:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

And I said in that discussion, Google search can't be used to determine a primary topic, flatly disproving that claim. wumbolo ^^^ 15:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

• Oppose. While I agree the results from search machines add little value, still it is obvious that Druzhba is a very generic word. Actually I think the present situation is quite correct: requesting "Druzhba" as such brings one to a disambiguation page - clearly illustrating how present the term is, even on these English language pages; one of the pages pointed to is Druzhba pipeline. For this once that things are perfectly in order, why would anyone wish to change them? What more could one wish? Jan olieslagers (talk) 16:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Since we are discussing a subject matter in Russia, I thought it worth its while to check what our Russian colleagues made of it. Unsurprisingly, I arrived at https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B1%D0%B0_(%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%84%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4). Jan olieslagers (talk) 16:52, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

• Oppose. Druzhba is just too generic. And usually (but not always, of course) we have the word pipeline included in the titles on pipelines' articles. Beagel (talk) 18:53, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

@Beagel: isn't Sputnik too generic? wumbolo ^^^ 21:45, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

It might well be. Perhaps that is why there is no Sputnik article, but there does exist a Sputnik (disambiguation) page. Jan olieslagers (talk) 04:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.