Talk:DuPont Central Research

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Fvhayden in topic Accurate Description

Untitled

edit

This article is great but I suggest renaming it to something like DuPont Central Research Department, the current title is confusing. Also the category Category:Laboratories would be more suitable. V8rik 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I couldn't help but notice that the author uses the past tense when saying "CRD became noted for its research in a number of important areas, but it was the broad range of expertise and cross-fertilization that made it the dynamic force that it was." Is the central research no longer a dynamic force?

Accurate Description

edit

This presentation accurately reflects the early days of Dupont Central Research. I was on that research staff 1959-1967. Fvhayden (talk) 16:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply