Talk:Duanquan

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Illusion Flame in topic Requested move 31 July 2023
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duan Quan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 31 July 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Duan QuanDuanquan – This is a Chinese phrase of the construction adjective + noun. Although it's not always clear when these should be treated as two words versus one word, in this case I think it clearly falls under the second scenario explained by the source I've cited ("the construction...has come to be treated as a single concept"). Pinging Jōkepedia in case they'd like to comment. Source: Yin, Binyong & Felly, Mary (1990), Chinese Romanization: Pronunciation & Orthography, Sinolingua, ISBN 7-80052-148-6, pp. 101-106 SilverStar54 (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support. Per the referenced source, "Duanquan" follows the rules of Hanyu Pinyin for noun construction and so meets the requirements of WP:NCZH, and it meets the requirements of WP:CONSISTENT as well. Jōkepedia (talk) 17:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.