 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dublin City Public Libraries and Archive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140701092703/http://www.impacdublinaward.ie/faqs/ to http://www.impacdublinaward.ie/faqs/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Merge
editI arrived here expecting to find the discussion thread opened by the editor proposing a merge. Not finding one, I'm opening this thread so that Herravondure can set out the reasons for the proposal and the actions that are proposed. @Herravondure:, it does seem that we have two articles covering overlapping topics, and so some rationalisation is likely required. But, can you explain what is proposed and why? (So that others can contribute and consensus agreed?) Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 18:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Resolved. Not hearing any input from the merge nominator, I have addressed the core issue (two near identical articles covering the exact same topic) by reverting this odd sequence of edits. Where an apparently connected editor "moved" the article and then immediately removed the residual redirect (effectively creating two articles covering the topic with the same content). If the original nominator wants to reopen and offer another proposed solution, then thread can be reopened. (Otherwise this thread, the lingering tag and these duplicated articles serve no purpose). Guliolopez (talk) 19:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)