Talk:Duckworth–Lewis–Stern method

(Redirected from Talk:Duckworth–Lewis method)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 21 January 2019

Australia-UAE game

edit

I'm removing the bit about the Australia - UAE game added by 144.131.7.245 because: a) there is no record of this game in the Cricinfo match archive and b) Most (all?) of the 1992 season was pre-D/L and I assume from the example given (if that game did indeed take place) that the match actually represents a good example of the problems with pre-D/L methods of target calculation. I'm also removing the 'criticism' which mentions radio commentators as there are no sources.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.168.18.255 (talk) 21:20, 11 February 2007.

Requested move 21 January 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


Duckworth–Lewis methodDuckworth–Lewis–Stern method – I believe that most major news sources now refer to either DLS or Duckworth–Lewis–Stern in their reporting / commentary of cricket (though a couple still use D/L in the statement of result on scorecard), so DLS is now the WP:COMMONNAME as well as the WP:OFFICIALNAME. Picking 2 recent matches to involve the use of the process (in an attempt to give extra weight to recent usage) :

Sri Lanka v England in October 2018
The following all use DLS and/or Duckworth-Lewis-Stern
For balance, the following either D/L or both DL and DLS:
Australia v India T20I in Nov 2018
Reporting in all the below use DLS, though there is still a hangover of D/L on a couple of scorecards
I've tried to include the first set of reliable sources I found on a google news search for these matches, and it does seem that almost all sources use DLS in their prose reporting, though there is still some use of DL on scorecards. As a side-note, I asked for an admin move of these pages to do exactly the above to be reversed, as this is a controversial move due to the previous discussion . Spike 'em (talk) 15:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Beeb are hedging their bets on their scorecard, showing "Australia win by 4 runs (DLS Method) (D/L)"!Spike 'em (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.